چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی

مطالعه طولی علل فساد اداری و روش های کنترل آن در مقاطع سال های 78 ، 88 و 99

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران.

2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: هدف از این مطالعه، بررسی روند تغییر مهمترین علل ظهور و مؤثرترین راهکارهای مدیریت فساد اداری در سه مقطع زمانی مختلف (سال 1378، سال 1388 و سال 1399) از منظر مدیران و کارکنان بخش دولتی در استان خراسان رضوی می‌باشد.
طراحی/ روش‌شناسی/ رویکرد: پژوهش حاضر از حیث هدف، کاربردی و از منظر روش گردآوری داده‌­ها، توصیفی- پیمایشی و از نوع بررسی روند بوده و جامعه آماری آن مدیران و کارکنان سازمان‌های دولتی خراسان رضوی می‌باشد.
یافته­‌های پژوهش: بر اساس تحلیل داده‌های جمع‌آوری شده در این سه مطالعه، عوامل اقتصادی از رتبه اول در سال 78 به رتبه سوم در سال 88 و 99 تنزل یافته و عوامل مرتبط با قوانین و مقررات که در سال‌های 78 و 88 در جایگاه پنجم (آخر) قرار داشتند به رتبه اول علل بروز فساد ارتقاء یافته‌اند. همچنین، قوانین و مقررات کارآمد به‌عنوان مهمترین راهکارهای کنترل فساد، از رتبه دوم در سال 78 به رتبه اول در دو مطالعه اخیر ارتقاء یافته و افزایش حقوق کارکنان دولت از رتبه اول در سال 78 به جایگاه سوم در سال 88 و به پله 13 در سال 99 سقوط کرده است.
محدودیت­‌ها و پیامدها: مهمترین محدودیت این پژوهش، همچون سایر مطالعات مشابه که در خصوص معضلات نظام اداری انجام می‌شود، محافظه‌کاری در پاسخگویی به سؤالات است که باعث می‌شود نرخ بازگشت پرسشنامه‌ها بسیار پایین بیاید و فرآیند اجرا را دشوارتر سازد.
پیامدهای عملی: بر اساس نتایج تحقیق، تمرکز بر شفاف‌­سازی قوانین و مقررات، اطلاع‌­رسانی در خصوص نحوه دریافت خدمات، ایجاد مکانیزم‌­های کارآمدتر در فرآیند تصمیم‌گیری سازمان‌های دولتی، اصلاح فرآیندها و ساختارهای اداره امور با رویکرد تشدید کنترل‌­های موجود و حصول اطمینان از اجرای دقیق قوانین و بستن راه‌های اعمال نفوذ و سلایق در اجرای مقررات می‌تواند به منظور مدیریت بهتر بیماری فساد مد نظر سیاست‌گذاران قرار گیرد.
ابتکار یا ارزش مقاله: در زمینه فساد اداری در ایران، مطالعۀ طولی انجام نشده و این مقاله با بهره‌گیری از رویکرد روندپژوهی، امکان شناسایی تغییرات نگرش در جامعه هدف و بهره‌گیری از آن را در تدوین سیاست‌­های اثربخش‌تر در این حوزه فراهم می­‌آورد.
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Longitudinal Study of the Causes of Administrative Corruption and its Control Methods in the Years of 1999, 2009 and 2021

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Farhadinejad 1
  • Karim Beyki 2

1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.

2 PhD Student in Public Administration, Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Purpose:  The purpose of this study is to investigate the trend of changes in the most important causes of emergence and the most effective strategies for managing corruption in three different time periods (1999, 2009 and 2021) from the perspective of managers and employees of the Khorasan Razavi public sector.
Design/ methodology/ approach: The present study is applied in terms of purpose and in terms of data collection method, it is descriptive-survey and longitudinal survey.
Research Findings:  Based on the analysis of data collected in these three studies, economic factors have decreased from the first rank in 1999 to the third ranks in 2009 and 2021 and the factors related to laws and regulations in 1999 And 2009 were in the fifth (last) position, up to the first rank of the causes of corruption. Also, efficient laws and regulations as the most important strategies to control corruption, have been upgraded from second place in 1999 to first place in the last two studies and increase the salaries of government employees from first place in 1999 to third place in 2009 and to 13th place in 2021 has fallen.
Limitations & Consequences:  Conservatism in answering questions, which makes the return rate of questionnaires very low and makes the implementation process more difficult.
Practical Consequences:  Based on the results of the research, the focus is on transparency of laws and regulations, informing about how to receive services, creating more efficient mechanisms in the decision-making process of governmental organizations, reforming processes and governance structures with the approach of tightening existing controls can be considered by policymakers in order to better manage of the disease of corruption.
Innovation or value of the Article:   In the field of administrative corruption in Iran, no longitudinal study has been done and this article, by using the trend research approach, provides the possibility of identifying changes in the attitude of the target society and using it in formulating more effective policies in this field.
Paper Type: Research Paper

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Administrative corruption
  • Longitudinal study of corruption
  • public organizations
  1. Abbaszadeh Vaqefi, Sh., Delkhah, J., Forouzandeh Dehkordi, L. (2017). Identifying Indigenous Causes of Corruption: A Case Study of Tehran Municipality. Auditing Knowledge, 17 (68), 5-40. (in persian)
  2. Aghazadeh, F., Abedi Jafari, H., Taherpour, H., Zarandi, H., (2019). Identifying individual factors affecting the tendency to corruption in Tehran Municipality. Organizational Behavior Studies, 8 (1), 49-74. (in persian)
  3. ArefNajade, M. Mousavi, S, N. Moayed, A. Piri, M. (2021). Identifying and explaining the antecedents and consequences of sectarian organizational behavior based on the Delphi. Public Administration Perspective(PAP).13(2) ,34-50. (in persian)
  4. Bai, J., Jayachandran, S., Malesky, E.J. and Olken, B.A. (2013) Does economic growth reduce corruption? Theory and evidence from Vietnam. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  5. Basyal, D.K., Poudyal, N. and Seo, J.-W. (2018), Does E-government reduce corruption? Evidence from a heterogeneous panel data model, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 12 (2), 134-154.
  6. Begovic, B. (2005). Corruption: concepts, types, causes and consequences. Center for Liberal-Democratic Studies.
  7. Bhattacharyya, S. and Hodler, R. (2015) Media freedom and democracy in the fight against corruption. European Journal of Political Economy. 39, 13-24.
  8. Binions, O. (2018). PhD thesis A study of corruption using the Institutional Analysis and Development framework with an application to the bidding phase of infrastructure procurement. University College. London
  9. Blanc, R., Islam, M.A., Patten, D.M. and Branco, M.C. (2017), "Corporate anti-corruption disclosure: An examination of the impact of media exposure and country-level press freedom", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(8), 1746-1770.
  10. Danaeifard, H., Abdali, R., Mahmoudi Kouchaksarai, A. (2020). Corruption and Administrative Health Research in Iran: A Domain Review. Auditing Knowledge, 20 (79), 201-218. (in persian)
  11. Degent, M, B. (2015) MSc thesis: Determinants of Corruption of Village Chiefs: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Rural Liberia. Wageningen University and Research Centre. Netherlands.
  12. De Graaf, G. (2007). Causes of corruption: Towards a contextual theory of corruption. Public Administration Quarterly, 31(1), 39-86.
  13. Dimant, Eugen & Tosato, Guglielmo (2017). Causes and Effects of Corruption: What has Past Decade's Empirical Research Taught Us? A Survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 1(1), 1-22.
  14. Elbahnasawy, N.G. (2013) E-government, internet adoption, and corruption: an empirical investigation. World Development 57(1), 114-126.
  15. Farhadinejad, M. (2016). Corruption; Experiences and Strategies. Semnan University Press, Semnan (in persian)
  16. Farhadinejad, M., Legzian, M. (2011). Longitudinal survey on the causes of corruption and its control methods (2000-2010). Public Administration Perspective(PAP),2(8), 45-60. (in persian)
  17. Heywood, P. M. (2017). Rethinking corruption: Hocuspocus, locus and focus. The Slavonic and East European Review, 95(1), 21–48.
  18. Hunady, J. (2019). The effect of the Internet on corruption awareness and corruption incidence in the EU. Information Policy 24 (1), 75–89
  19. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2021/index/irn
  20. Kenny, C. (2006). Measuring and Reducing the Impact of Corruption in Infrastructure. World Bank Working Paper
  21. Khodad-Hoseini, S, H. Farhadinejad, M. (2011). Investigating corruption and its control methods. Lecturer of Humanities-Management Research in Iran.5(1), 37-53. (in persian)
  22. Ledger, A., Baker, F. (2005). Longitudinal research designs in music therapy: Recommendations from a study of people with dementia. Australian Journal of Music Therapy, 16, 88-103.
  23. Mahmud, N.M., Mohamed, I.S. and Arshad, R. (2022), The supply-side of corruption: a review of scenario, causes and prevention measure, Journal of Financial Crime, 29(1), 34-44.
  24. Mir Khalili, M., Asgari Marwat, A., Bahrami Garou, M. (2020). The role of organizational justice in preventing corruption. Journal of Criminal Law, 11 (21), 275-296. (in persian)
  25. Mousavi Doust, S., M. (2019). Causes and consequences of corruption. New research approaches in management and accounting, 3 (25), 34-43. (in persian)
  26. Mungiu-Pippidi, A., Dadašov, R. (2017). When do anticorruption laws matter? The evidence on public integrity enabling contexts. Crime Law & Social Change, 68(4), 387–402.
  27. Najranhavandi, M., Khorsand Asyaber, H. (2019). Study of the relationship between human development indicators and corruption in selected countries during the years 2010 to 2012. Social Development Studies of Iran, 11(2), 85-89. (in persian)
  28. Nosoohi, M. Etebarian, A. Hadi Paykani, M. Ebrahimzade, R. (2021). Explain the Open Policy Making Model in Realizing Principle of Open Government. Public Administration Perspective(PAP). 13 (2), 15-33. (in persian)
  29. Olken, B. Pande, R. (2012). Corruption in Developing Countries. Annual Review of Economics. 4(1), 479-509.
  30. Perez Torres, G. (2020), The effectiveness of the international anti-corruption legal framework in the context and practice of Colombia, 27
  31. Perumal, K. (2022). Corruption Measurements: Caught Between Conceptualizing the Phenomenon and Promoting New Governance Agenda? Journal of Financial Crime,26 (1), 31-38.
  32. Pilz, O. (2020). Master thesis, Political Competition and Public Procurement Corruption Risks in Hungarian Municipalities between 2010-2019. Central European University’s School of Public Policy
  33. Rauen, V. (2016). Corruption: Uncovering the Price of Normative Morality and the Value of Ethics, German Law Journal, 17(1), 101-117
  34. Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption around the world: Causes, consequences, scope, and cures. Staff Papers-International Monetary Fund, 559-594.

35.UNDOC. (2021). Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/e4j/en/anti-corruption/module-1/key-issues/effects-of-corruption.html

  1. Vakili Fard, H., Dehghan, H., Fazilat, F. (2014). Factors affecting the reduction of administrative and financial corruption and its dimensions in selected government organizations. Interdisciplinary Studies in Strategic Knowledge,5(17), 115-135. (in persian)
  2. WORLD BANK. (1997). Helping Countries Combat Corruption: The Role of theWorld Bank. Available: http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/anticorrupt/corruptn/corrptn.pdf
  3. Zare, A., Fathizadeh, A. Bahmani, R. (2018). Organizational kinship in government institutions; Conceptualization, effective factors and events. Organizational Behavior Studies, 7 (1), 31-56. (in persian).
چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی
دوره 14، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 53
1402
صفحه 59-75