شناسایی و اولویت بندی پیشایندها و پسایندهای رهبری چابک در سازمان های دانش بنیان: یک رویکرد آمیخته

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی (با رویکردهای آمیخته)

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران.

2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران.

3 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران

4 استاد، گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه لرستان، خرم آباد، ایران

چکیده

هدف: پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی پیشایندها و پسایندهای سبک رهبری چابک با استفاده از روش دلفی فازی صورت پذیرفت.
طراحی/ روش‌شناسی/ رویکرد: این پژوهش از نوع پژوهش‌های آمیخته با رویکرد کیفی و کمی در پارادایم استقرایی است که از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از لحاظ ماهیت و روش، اکتشافی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش شرکت‌های دانش‌بنیان در استان لرستان هستند که 30 نفر از خبرگان آنها بر اساس اصل کفایت نظری و با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شده‌اند. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها در بخش کیفی مصاحبه و در بخش کمی پرسشنامه بود.
یافته‌های پژوهش: نتایج پژوهش نشان‌دهنده آن است که از میان پیشایندهای رهبری چابک، انعطاف‌پذیری، مهارت تفکر خلاقانه، قابلیت مدیریت ذی‌نفعان، شخصیت یادگیرنده، آگاهی محیطی بالا و سواد دیجیتال مهم‌ترین عوامل هستند. همچنین از میان پسایندهای رهبری چابک، چابکی سازمان، افزایش رضایت‌مندی و تعهد کارکنان، افزایش رضایت‌مندی و تعهد مشتریان، ترویج تفکر خلاقانه و پرهیز از سکون، اشاعه فرهنگ یادگیری مداوم و افزایش کارایی و اثربخشی سازمان نیز مهم‌ترین پیامدهای این سبک رهبری در سازمان‌های دانش‌بنیان می‌باشند.
محدودیت‌ها و پیامدها: از جمله محدودیت‌های پژوهش  به دسترسی دشوار به اعضای نمونه و زمان‌بر بودن جمع‌آوری اطلاعات از آنها، همچنین کم بودن ادبیات و مبانی نظری مرتبط با سبک رهبری چابک اشاره کرد.
پیامدهای عملی: شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی پیشایندها و پسایندهای سبک رهبری چابک.
ابتکار یا ارزش مقاله: رهبری چابک یک مفهوم نو و جدید در ادبیات رهبری و مدیریت است و پژوهش‌های انجام شده در این زمینه در داخل کشور بسیار اندک است، از این‌رو پژوهش حاضر با شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر این سبک رهبری و پیامدهای آن هم د مبنایی برای پژوهش‌های آینده قرار گیرد و هم راهنمایی برای رهبران و مدیران سازمان‌های دانش‌بنیان برای به‌کارگیری مناسب این سبک رهبری باشد.
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying and prioritizing the antecedents and consequences of agile leadership in knowledge-based organizations: A mixed approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fariborz Fathi Chegeni 1
  • amir hoshang nazarpioori 2
  • Seyed Najmodin Moosavi 3
  • Reza Sepahvand 4
1 PhD Candidateof Management, Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.
2 2. Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.
4 Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Purpose: The aim of this study is to identify and prioritize the antecedents and consequences of agile leadership style using fuzzy Delphi method.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This research is a type of mixed  research with a qualitative and quantitative approach in the inductive paradigm, which is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-survey in terms of nature and method. The statistical population of the research was knowledge-based companies in Lorestan Province, from which 30 experts were selected according to purposive sampling method. Data collection tools were in the qualitative part of the interview and in the quantitative part of the questionnaire.
Research Findings: The results show that among the precedents of agile leadership, flexibility, creative thinking skills, stakeholder management ability, learner personality, high environmental awareness and digital literacy are the most important factors. Organizational Agility, increasing Employee satisfaction and commitment, increasing customer satisfaction and commitment, promoting creative thinking and avoiding stagnation, spreading the culture of continuous learning and increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of the organization are the most important consequences of this leadership style in knowledge-based organizations.
Limitations & Consequences: Research limitations include difficult access to sample members and the time it takes to collect information from them, as well as the lack of literature and theoretical foundations related to agile leadership style.
Practical Consequences: Identifying and prioritizing the antecedents and consequences of agile leadership Style.
Innovation or value of the Article: Agile leadership is a new concept in the leadership and management literature and research in this field is very limited in the country, so the present study by identifying the factors affecting this leadership style and its consequences, can also be a basis for further research and provide guidance for leaders and managers of knowledge-based organizations to make appropriate use of this leadership style.
Paper Type: Research Article

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Leadership
  • Agility
  • Agile Leadership
  • Knowledge Based Organizations
  1. Ahmadi, M., Fekri, R., Babaeian, M., Fathian, M. (2016). Agility of after-sales service chain of heavy vehicles in Iran. Journal of Management Improvement, 10(1),101 122.(in Persian)
  2. Akkaya, B. (2020). Review of leadership styles in perspective of dynamic capabilities: An empirical research on managers in manufacturing firms. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(36), 389–407.
  3. Akkaya, B., Koçyiğit, Y., & Tabak, A. (2018). Çalışanlar tarafindan algilanan çoklu liderlik tarzlarinin ekstra çaba, Etkililik ve doyum üzerine etkisi: Teknogirişim firmalari üzerine bir araştırma. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 58, 185–196.
  4. Atashi, A., Rastgar, A., Damghanian, H. (2019). A Grounded Theory Approach: Model of Knowledge Workers Leadership in Iranian Knowledge-Based Organizations. Majlis and Rahbord, 26(97), 251-287. (in Persian)
  5. A., Faraji. H. (2002). Fuzzy management science, Tehran, Ejtema Publication, First ed. (in Persian)
  6. Chamanifard, R & Nikpour, A (2019). New leadership styles in the organization, Tehran: University Jihad Organization Publications. (in Persian)
  7. Cheng, C.h., & Lin, Y. (2002). Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142(1), 174-186.
  8. Coleman, J. (2017, January 04). The best strategic leaders balance agility and consistency. Harvard Business Review, pp. 1–5
  9. De Meuse, K. P., Dai, G., & Hallenbeck, G. S. (2010). Learning agility: A construct whose time has Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(2), 119–130.
  10. Fahim, S., Hassani, M., Qalavandi, H., & Ghalei, A. (2019). Presenting the model of Organizational Structure agility Razi University of Kermanshah. Journal of Public Administration Perspective, 10(1), 214-239. (in Persian)
  11. Fakhari, H. (2014). Review of Knowledge-based Firms Definition Consistent with the Economic Conditions of Iran. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 7(4), 69-88. (in Persian)
  12. Fernández, J.A. (2005). The Agile Leader: Conditions for Succeeding in China, Mobley, W.H. and Weldon, E. (Ed.) Advances in Global Leadership (Advances in Global Leadership, Vol. 4), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, 255-275.
  13. Hamad, Z, M. M., & Yozgat, U. (2017). Does organizational agility affect organizational learning capability? Evidence from commercial banking. Management Science Letters, 7, 407–22
  14. Hayward, S. (2018). The agile leadership. How to create an agile business in the digital age? London: Kogan Page Limited.
  15. B., & Wolff. R. (2003). "Organizing, learning, and strategizing: From construction to discovery"; In Meinolf Dierkes, Ariane Berthoin Antal, John Child, & Ikujiro Nonaka. (Eds.). Handbook of Rganizational Learning & Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 535-556.
  16. Henson, C. (2015). Agile leadership for a changing workplace. Learning Quest. Retrieved from https://www.learningquest.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Agile-Leadership
  17. Holbeche, L. (2015). The Agile Organization: How to build an innovative, sustainable and resilient business. London: UK: Kogan Page Publishers.
  18. Horney, N., Pasmore, B., & O’Shea, T. (2010). Leadership agility: A business imperative for a VUCA People & Strategy, 33(4), 32–38.
  19. Jafar Zadeh Zarandi, M., Sharifian, E., Ghahreman Tabrizi, K. (2019). Explaining Organizational Agility Model Based on Information Technology from the Perspective of Sports Experts. Sport Management Studies, 10(52), 137-160. (in Persian)
  20. M., Akhavan. P., & Rezaei J. (2008). Critical success factors in reengineering processes. Management Researches in Iran, 13(2), 23-64. (in Persian)
  21. Joiner, B. (2019). Leadership Agility for organizational agility. Journal of Creating Value, 5(2), 139–149.
  22. Joiner, B., & Josephs, S. (2007). Leadership agility; Five levels of mastery for anticipating and initiating change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  23. Medinilla, Á. (2012). Agile management: Leadership in an agile environment. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
  24. Meyer, R. (2016). Agility shift: Creating agile and effective leaders, teams, and organizations. New York, NY: Routledge.
  25. Meyer, R., & Meijers, R. (2017). Leadership agility: Developing your repertoire of leadership styles. London: Routledge.
  26. Nazar Poori, A., Shariat Nejad, A., Saedi, A., Haji Zadeh, A. (2018). Identifying the Manager’s Mental Pattern in Order to Human Capital Agility in Sports Organizations Using the Q Approach. Sport Management Studies, 10(50), 227-246. (in Persian)
  27. Nikpour, A. (2020). The Impact of Manager’s Lean Leadership Skills on Readiness for Change in Public Sector with the Mediating Role of Organizational Trust. Organizational Behaviour Studies Quarterly, 9(4), 69-94. (in Persian)
  28. Şahin, S. and Alp, F. (2020). Agile Leadership Model in Health Care: Organizational and Individual Antecedents and Outcomes, Akkaya, B. (Ed.) Agile Business Leadership Methods for Industry 4.0, Emerald Publishing Limited, 47-68.
  29. Saldena, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Translate by Guywan, A., Scientific and Cultural Publishing Company.
  30. Yarmohammadi, Zakaria; Purkiani, Massoud; Selajegheh, Sanjar; Sheikhi, Ayub and Sayadi, Saeed (2019). Investigating the relationship between human resource optimization and organizational agility and the mediating role of organizational justice, Journal of Public Administration Perspective,10(2), 238-274. (in Persian)
  31. Zare, F., & Hosseini, S.A. (2017). Investigating the role of spiritual leadership on organizational agility. Journal of Public Administration Perspective, 8 (2), 98-117. (in Persian)