From the 1404 Vision Document to the 1430 Horizon: Adaptive Governance of Iran’s National Vision and the Role of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence

Document Type : Research Article

Author
Davood Manzoor
Department of Economics, Imam Sadiq University
10.48308/jpap.2026.240616.1488
Abstract
Purpose: This article examines the adaptive-governance mechanisms required to transform a national vision from a primarily directional document into a monitorable, learning-oriented, and revisable framework. It also investigates the supporting role of big data and artificial intelligence in analysis, monitoring, scenario development, and policy decision support during the transition from Iran’s 1404 Vision Document to the 1430 horizon.
Design/ methodology/ approach: The study adopts an applied qualitative design and employs directed document analysis and a structured comparison of Finland, Estonia, Singapore, South Korea, the United Arab Emirates, and Malaysia. The evidence was examined through six dimensions: operational definition of goals, indicators, and baselines; data governance and interoperability; analytical capacity, foresight, and scenario development; institutional coordination and accountability; policy review and learning; and legal, ethical, and public-trust requirements.
Research Findings: The findings indicate that, despite its important role in setting broad national directions, the 1404 Vision Document had limitations in establishing clear, traceable links among goals, indicators, data, institutional responsibilities, implementation arrangements, reporting, and periodic review. Evidence from economic performance, science and technology, welfare, and regional standing also shows uneven performance and difficulty tracing the chain from goal-setting to policy feedback. The comparative analysis shows that the effectiveness of big data and artificial intelligence depends less on technology alone than on data quality and interoperability, institutional coordination, human oversight, transparency, and accountability. The study develops three exploratory scenarios for the 1430 horizon: continued fragmented governance, dispersed digitalization, and adaptive data-driven governance.
Limitations & Consequences: The study relies on documents and secondary evidence and does not test causal relationships between individual factors and the achievement of vision objectives. The scenarios are exploratory and require further validation through expert-based research, administrative data, and sector-specific evaluations.
Practical Consequences: The 1430 Vision should link every broad objective to measurable indicators, baselines, data sources, responsible institutions, implementation arrangements, financing sources, periodic reporting, and midterm review mechanisms. Big data and artificial intelligence should be deployed gradually and problem-specifically, alongside human oversight and clear rules for data protection and accountability.
Innovation or value of the Article: The article develops an adaptive-governance framework for national visions by connecting vision evaluation with data governance, foresight, and artificial intelligence. Rather than treating technology as an independent objective, it conceptualizes big data and artificial intelligence as tools to strengthen analysis, monitoring, learning, and policy adjustment.
Paper Type: Original Paper
Keywords
National Vision
Adaptive Governance
Big Data
Artificial Intelligence
Data Governance
Foresight
Evidence-Based Policymaking
1.      Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027
2.      Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2014). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545–547. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
3.      Feizpour, M. A., & Asayesh, F. (2014). Development in Iran and a comparison with countries in the region: The Vision Document. Majles va Rahbord, 21(78), 85–119. (in Persian)
4.      Government of Malaysia. (2015). Eleventh Malaysia Plan, 2016–2020: Anchoring growth on people. Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister’s Department. https://www.ekonomi.gov.my/en/economic-developments/development-plans/rmk/eleventh-malaysia-plan-2016-2020
5.      Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687
6.      Information System Authority. (2026, April 6). Data exchange layer X-tee. https://www.ria.ee/en/state-information-system/data-exchange-platforms/data-exchange-layer-x-tee
7.      Islamic Consultative Assembly. (2024). Law on the Seventh Five-Year Progress Plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2024–2029). Qavanin.ir. https://qavanin.ir/Law/TreeText/?IDS=15033449572675229448 (in Persian)
8.      Janssen, M., van der Voort, H., & Wahyudi, A. (2017). Factors influencing big data decision-making quality. Journal of Business Research, 70, 338–345. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.007
9.      Keshvardoost, S. (2025). Exploring barriers to achieving the objectives of Iran’s Twenty-Year Vision Document: Lessons for the future. Faslnameh-ye Siasatgozari-ye Omumi, 11(3), 68–81. doi: 10.22059/jppolicy.2025.103596 (in Persian)
10.   Kitchin, R. (2014). Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1177/2053951714528481
11.   Legatum Institute. (2023). Iran: The Legatum Prosperity Index 2023. https://index.prosperity.com/globe/iran
12.   Macal, C. M., & North, M. J. (2010). Tutorial on agent-based modelling and simulation. Journal of Simulation, 4(3), 151–162. doi: 10.1057/jos.2010.3
13.   Ministry of Science and ICT. (2019). National strategy for artificial intelligence. Government of the Republic of Korea. https://english.msit.go.kr/eng/bbs/view.do?bbsSeqNo=46&mId=10&mPid=9&nttSeqNo=9&sCode=eng
14.   Ministry of Science and ICT. (2021, May 13). Strategy to realize trustworthy artificial intelligence. https://www.msit.go.kr/eng/bbs/view.do?bbsSeqNo=42&mId=4&mPid=2&nttSeqNo=509
15.   Movasegh, M., & Setoudeh Arani, M. (2018). Assessment of the regional power status of Iran and Turkey within the framework of the Vision Document (2003–2015). Faslnameh-ye Takhasosi-ye Olum-e Siasi, 14(42), 149–185. (in Persian)
16.   Namdarian, L., & Kalantari, N. (2020). Thematic analysis of science, technology, and innovation assessment indicators in countries of the 1404 Vision region. Rahyaft, (77), 45–69. (in Persian)
17.   Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence (OECD/LEGAL/0449). https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0449
18.   Parliament of Finland. (n.d.). Committee for the Future. Retrieved June 24, 2026, from https://www2.eduskunta.fi/EN/valiokunnat/tulevaisuusvaliokunta/Pages/default.aspx
19.   Radfar, A. (2014). Assessment of the achievement of scientometric indicators in the 1404 Vision Document. Siasat-e Elm va Fanavari, 6(3), 55–66. (in Persian)
20.   Roudari, J., Zayandeh-Roudi, M., & Mehrabi Bisharabadi, H. (2020). The role of the knowledge-based economy in the technology-gap ratio among countries in Iran’s 1404 Vision region. Pazhuhesh-ha-ye Eghtesadi-ye Iran, 25(84), 191–226. doi: 10.22054/ijer.2020.45491.783 (in Persian)
21.   Shaghaghi-Shahri, V. (2017). Assessment of Iran’s economic status in the Vision Document. Eqtesad va Olgusazi, 8(30), 1–29. (in Persian)
22.   Shaghaghi-Shahri, V. (2018). Evaluation of the country’s five-year development plans in terms of achieving the economic objectives of the Vision Document. Majles va Rahbord, 25(94), 209–237. (in Persian)
23.   Smart Nation Singapore. (2023). Singapore national AI strategy 2.0. https://go.gov.sg/nais2023
24.   Smart Nation Singapore. (2026). Update to NAIS: Singapore National AI Strategy. https://isomer-user-content.by.gov.sg/39/73e87bfe-77af-4fd5-8d8b-445fa7068b76/NAIS_update.pdf
25.   Tõnurist, P., & Hanson, A. (2020). Anticipatory innovation governance: Shaping the future through proactive policy making. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, 44. OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/cce14d80-en
26.   UAE Government. (2022). We the UAE 2031 vision. https://u.ae/en/about-the-uae/strategies-initiatives-and-awards/strategies-plans-and-visions/innovation-and-future-shaping/we-the-uae-2031-vision
27.   United Nations Development Programme. (2025). Human Development Report 2025: A matter of choice: People and possibilities in the age of AI. United Nations Development Programme. https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2025
28.   Vision document of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the 1404 Solar Hijri horizon. (2003). Majles Research Center. (in Persian)
29.   Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector—Applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596–615. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103
30.   World Bank. (2024). Iran Economic Monitor, Spring 2024: Sustaining growth amid rising geopolitical tensions—With a special focus: Recent poverty and inequality trends in Iran (2020–2022). World Bank Group. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099051007102421530
31.   World Intellectual Property Organization. (2024). Global Innovation Index 2024: Unlocking the promise of social entrepreneurship (17th ed.). https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.50062