Developing Comprehensive Model of Performance using Multilevel Approach

Document Type : Research Article (with quantitative approaches)

Author
asadollah ganjali
assisstant
10.48308/jpap.2019.96488
Abstract
Performance is a multilevel phenomena and conventional theorizing approach, which studies performance in micro or macro level, can not analyzes this phenomena since it can not consider top-down and bottom-up effect of interested phenomena. As a result, errors accurse due to simplification of organizational phenomena. Multilevel approach enables the researchers and managers to see organizational phenomena as a multilevel subject and to analyze the effect of phenomenon in the higher level and also the influence of higher level factors at the phenomenon. Therefor, it can decrees or alleviate the gap between theory and practice. The importance of performance management is obvious ;however, there is not a comprehensive model that describes the concept of performance and variables and the relation between these variables in individual, team and organizational level. This study aims at developing a comprehensive model of organizational performance using multilevel approach. This is a developmental study based on research objective and was conducted using exploratory strategy and qualitative method. After studying more than one thousand scientific documents including articles and books, the single-level model of individual, team and organizational performance were developed. Then, the cross-level models were developed. Finally, the comprehensive model of organizational performance was developed using multilevel approach.
  1. Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. and Culpepper, A. (2013), Best-practice recommendations for estimating interaction effects using multilevel modeling, Journal of Management, 39: 1490–528.
  2. Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg P. and Kalleberg, A. (2000), Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-performance Work Systems Pay Off, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
  3. Armstrong, Michael (2006). Performance Management: Key Strategies and Practical Guidelines. 3 nd Edition. Kogan page: London & Philadelphia
  4. Armstrong, M. (2009), Armstrong's Handbook of Performance Management: An Evidence-Based Guide to Delivering High Performance, 4th Edition, London: Kogan Page.
  5. Beech, Nic & Crane, Oliver (1999). High performance teams and a climate of community. Team Performance Management, 5(3), 87-102.
  6. Beer, M. & Ruh, R.A. (1996). Employee Growth Through Performance Management. Harvard Business Review, 54(4).
  7. Bryman, Alan, & Bell, Emma (2007). Business Research Methods. Oxford University Press, 2th Ed.
  8. Cloete, Fanie (2003). Assessing Governance with Electronic Policy Management Tools. Public Performance & Management Review, 26(3), 276-290.
  9. Edmonstone, John (1996). Appraising the state ofperformance appraisal. Health Manpower Management, 22(6), 9–13
  10. Flapper, Simme Douwe P.; Fortuin, Leonard & Stoop, Paul P.M. (1996). Towards consistent performance management systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(7), 27-37.
  11. Forslund, Helena (2007). The impact of performance management on customers’ expected logistics performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(8), 901-918
  12. Georgakakis, D. and Ruigrok, W. (2017), CEO Succession Origin and Firm Performance: A Multilevel Study, Journal of Management Studies, 54(1), 58-87
  13. Gerrish, E. (2016), The Impact of Performance Management on Performance in Public Organizations: A Meta-Analysis, Public Administration Review, 76(1), 48–66.
  14. Grote, Dick (2002). The Performance Appraisal Question and Answer Book: a Survival Guide for Managers. AMACOM
  15. Gruman, J.A. and Saks, A.M. (2010), Performance management and employee engagement, Human Resource Management Review, 21, 123-136
  16. Hatch, Mary Jo (1997). Organization Theory, OxfordUniversity Press.
  17. Heide, Darrel P. (2003). A Comprehensive Performance Management Model. United States International University.
  18. Kull, T.J. and Narasimhan, R. (2010), Quality Management and Cooperative Values: Investigation of Multilevel Influences onWorkgroup Performance, Decision Sciences, 41(1), 81-113
  19. Liu, X. and Batt, R. (2010), How Supervisors Influence Performance: A Multilevel Study of Coaching and Group Management in Technology-Mediated Services, Personnel Psychology, 63: 265-298
  20. Mackey, A. and Barney, J.B. (2015), Developing Multi-Level Theory in Strategic Management: The Case of Managerial Talent and Competitive Advantage, Multi-Level Issues in Strategy and Methods, pp.163-175, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1475-9144(05)04006-3
  21. Magee, Kimberly Clauss (2002). The Impact of Organizational Culture on the Implementation of Performance Management. Georgia State University.
  22. Rezaeian, Ali & Ganjali, Asadollah (2009), Multilevel Approach and its Application to Organizational Theorizing, Strategic Management Thought, 3(2), 5-40
  23. Taylor, J. (2015), Closing the Rhetoric-Reality Gap? Employees’ Perspective of Performance Management in the Australian Public Service, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(3), 336–353.
  24. Zhang, Z., Waldman, D.A. and Wang, Z. (2012), A Multilevel Investigation of Leader-Member Exchange, Informal Leader Emergence and Individual and Team Performance, Personnel Psychology, 65: 49-78