Document Type : Research Article
Author
Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Science and Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Purpose: Performance-related problems are issues that managers always face; therefore, management must recognize the factors affecting employee performance. Many factors influence employee performance, among them, ostracism and work discipline are two key elements that have gained more attention among organizations recently; hence, the present research aimed to examine the impact of ostracism in the workplace on job performance with the mediating role of work discipline among employees of government offices.
Design/methodology/approach: This research is applied in terms of its objective, utilizing a descriptive survey approach in its execution and data collection method. The statistical population of the study consisted of all 207 employees of government offices in Sahneh County, from which 135 individuals were selected as the sample using Cochran's method and stratified random sampling. However, 125 individuals participated in the study. Three questionnaires were used to collect data: a) Hitlan and Noel's (2009) Workplace Rejection Questionnaire; b) Amirnejad's (2012) Work Discipline Questionnaire; c) Michleson and Olson's (2019) Job Performance Questionnaire. Structural equation modeling with the partial least squares method and Smart-PLS version 4 software was used to analyze the data.
Research Findings: The analysis of the descriptive findings showed that the mean and standard deviation of the variable of rejection were 34.36 and 5.68, work discipline were 41.43 and 2.05, and job performance were 25.95 and 2.64. Additionally, the value of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic is significant in two variables: work discipline and job performance. Therefore, Smart-PLS4 statistical software was used to analyze the data. To investigate the adequacy and appropriateness of the conceptual model of the research, structural equation analysis was used. In the development of the initial model, a total of 33 items (17 items for the rejection variable, 10 items for the work discipline variable, and six items for the job performance variable) were entered. In the initial review of the model, items with weak factor load were identified and removed from the model. Nine items were eliminated from the rejection variable, three items from the work discipline variable, and two items from the job performance variable. Before reviewing the research hypotheses, the validity and reliability of the constructs were investigated and confirmed.
The research findings showed that workplace ostracism has a positive and significant effect on job performance and a non-significant negative impact on employee work discipline; however, the effect of work discipline on job performance is negative but non-significant. Additionally, the indirect effect of ostracism on job performance, mediated by work discipline, is not significant, indicating that the mediating role of work discipline is not significant.
Limitations & Consequences: The limited sample size and the use of a questionnaire as the sole measurement tool, along with a lack of existing theories in the research area, reduced the validity and generalizability of the results.
Practical Consequences: The primary outcome of this research is to increase managers' awareness of employee ostracism and its impact in the workplace, prompting them to establish clear disciplinary policies that enhance employees' psychological security and mitigate the adverse effects of ostracism. Implementing mechanisms such as peer and manager support programs and educational initiatives can enhance workplace culture and improve employee well-being, serving as an effective deterrent to workplace ostracism.
Innovation or value of the Article: presenting a model that shows the consequences of ostracism in the workplace and work discipline on the job performance of employees in government offices.
Paper Type: Original Paper
Keywords