چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی

الگویی برای یادگیری الکترونیکی در مؤسسات آموزش عالی کشور

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی ( با رویکردهای کمی)

نویسندگان

دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش، ارائه الگویی برای یادگیری­ الکترونیکی در کشور ایران است. این پژوهش، از نوع آمیخته بوده و در دو مرحله انجام شده­ است. مرحله اول؛ کاربردی توسعه­ ای با جامعه آماری خبرگان مطرح دانشگاهی حوزه یادگیری­ الکترونیکی، روش نمونه­گیری هدفمند-ملاک­ محور و روش­های گردآوری داده­، مطالعات کتابخانه­ ای و مصاحبه. مرحله دوم؛ همبستگی (معادلات ساختاری) با نمونه­­ آماری۳۷۶ نفری از اعضای هیأت ­علمی، مدیران و کارشناسان فنی و دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی با ابزار گردآوری داده­ ها پرسشنامه محقق­ ساخته.نتایج حاصل از پژوهش تاثیر ابعاد تدوین، محتوا، پشتیبانی، راهبرد آموزشی، رابط کاربری، بازاریابی اینترنتی، فناوری، کانال ارتباطی، عوامل فردی بر رضایت کاربران و کارایی یادگیری‌‌الکترونیکیِ مؤسسات آموزش عالی ایران را تایید کرده ­است. همچنین متغیر کانال ارتباطی، بر محتوا و رضایت کاربران تأثیری مثبت و معنادار داشته و تأثیر مثبت و معنادار رضایت کاربران بر کارایی یادگیری ­الکترونیکی نیز تأیید شده­ است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Model for Electronic Learning in Higher Education Institutions

نویسندگان [English]

  • Kamran Feizi
  • Payam Hanafizadeh
  • MohammadReza NiliAhmadabadi
  • Hamideh Alaeddin

Allameh Tabataba’i University

چکیده [English]

The current paper aims at providing a model for electronic learning in Iran. This is a mixed type paper done in two stages. The first step includes an applied development with the statistical community of the experts in the field of e-learning, and the purposeful-criterion sampling method was used with library studies and interviews data collection methods. The second step includes correlational structural equations with the sample of 376 faculty members, managers and technical experts and graduate students. data was collected using an researcher-made questionnaire.
The results of the research confirmed the impact of design dimensions, content, support, training strategy, user interface, Internet marketing, technology, communication channels, individual factors on user satisfaction and the e-learning efficiency of Iranian higher education institutions. Also, the communication channel variable has a positive and significant effect on users' content and satisfaction, and the positive and significant effect of user satisfaction on e-learning performance has also been confirmed.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • e-learning- Structural Equation Modeling
  • Higher Education Institutions
  1. Ali Nejad, M., Sarmadi, M., Zandi, B. And Shobeiri, Q. M., (2011), "The Level of Information Literacy and Its Role in the Process of E-Learning for Students", Journal of Information Research and Public Libraries, Volume 17, No 2, pp. 371-377. [in Persian]
  2. Atayi, Sh. And Najibi A., (2010), E-learning Model of Engineering Courses, Iranian Journal of Engineering Education Quarterly, No. 48, pp. 149-170. [in Persian]
  3. Caro, E. M., Navarro, G. C. & Carrion, G. C., (2014), An application of the performance-evaluation model for e-learning quality in higher education, Total Quality Management & business excellence, Vol. 26, Issue 5-6, pp. 632-647.
  4. Caro, E., Cegarra-Navarro, J.G. & Cepeda-Carrion, G. (2014), “An application of the performance-evaluation model for e-learning quality in higher education”, Total quality management & Business excellent, Vol. 26, pp. 632-647.
  5. Castillo-Merino, D., & Serradell-Lopez, E. (2014), An analysis of the determinants students performance in e-learning. Computers in Human Behaviour, 476-484.
  6. Chan, E.S.K & Swatman, P. M. C., (2002), “eBusiness model for networked learing”, technical university of Berlin, Germany, 1-4 May.
  7. Culwin, F. and Lancaster, T., (2000), “Areview of electronic services for plagiarism detection in student submissions”, available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/
  8. Gasco, J. L., Llopis, J. and Gonzalez, R., (2004), “the use of information technology in training human resources- an e-learning case study”, Journal of europen industrial training, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 370-382.
  9. Hanafizadeh, P. & Yarmohammadi, M., (2015), “An integrated conceptualization of content in an information society”, information development, SAGE publication, pp.1-10.
  10. Harirchian, Martyr M., Yarmohammadian, M. H. Bahrami, S., Bahadorani, M. And Soleimanian M., (2010), Web-based education; A study on knowledge, attitude and practice of faculty members of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Health Information Management, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 243-250. [in Persian]
  11. Holsapple, C. W. & Lee-post, A., (2006), Defining, Assessing, and Promoting E-learning Success: An Information Systems Perspective, Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, Vol. 4 (1), pp. 67-85.
  12. Karimzadgan Moghaddam, D., Hassanzadeh, E. And Motaghian, E., (2012), Evaluation of Effective Factors in Adoption of Learning-Based Systems by Faculties of the University By Using a Combined Model, Management Researches in Iran, Tarbiat Modarres University, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp. 41- 72. [in Persian]
  13. Khalili, L., Hedayati Khosh mehr, A., Rasoul-zadeh Aghdam, p. And Sheibani, B. (2017), the Relationship between Information Literacy and Students' Learning Motivation, Human and Information Interaction, Vol. 4, No. 2. [in Persian]
  14. Khan, B. H. (2005). Managing e-learning: Design, delivery. implementation and evaluation. Hershey: information SciencePublishing.
  15. MacDonald, C. J. & Thompson, T. L., (2005), “Structure, content, delivery, service and outcomes: quality e-learning in higher education”, International review of research in open distance learning, Vol. 6, No. 2.
  16. Maleki, A., Faqihnejad, S., Taran, Z. And Najafi, L (2015), Faculty Members' Attitudes toward Electronic Education, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Journal of Research in Medical Education Strategies, No. 3, pp. 160-164. [in Persian]
  17. Mason, R. and Rennie, F. (2006), E-learning: The key concept, Routledge, Abingdon, Great Britain.
  18. Mohammadyari, S. & Singh, H., (2014). Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy, Computer & Education, Vol. 82, Issue C, pp. 11-25.
  19. Mohr, J. J. and Sohi, R. S., (1995), “Communication flows in distribution channels: impact on assessments of communication quality and satisfaction”, Journal of retailing, Vol. 71, pp. 393-416.
  20. Nick Nafas and Ali Abadi, Kh. (2013), The role of content analysis in the process of teaching and designing textbooks, World Media Journal, No. 16, pp. 124-150. [in Persian]
  21. Quis team, 2005, “cost effectiveness and cost efficiency in e-learnilearning”, Mid Sweden University
  22. Rezapur, M., Sepehri, M. M And Rezapur, H., (2013), Determining the best methods for assessing learners in e-learning courses-Data approach, Management researches in Iran, Tarbiat Modarres University, Volume 17, Number 4, Pages 139- 160. [in Persian]
  23. Rowley, J., (2006), “An analysis of the e-service literature: towards a research agenda”, Internet Research, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 339-359. Emerald Group.
  24. Safavid, E, Bavaghar, M. And Ghafari, H., (2015), Criteria for producing electronic courses and standards, Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, Volume 13, Number 1, Pages 27-57. [in Persian]
  25. Seyfori, V., Ghafari, S., (2012), “information literacy of senior students in Razi University of Krmanshah”, Inf syst ser, 1(1), pp. 95-108.
  26. Siamak, M., Alipour, K., Khaleghi, N., (2013), “Measurement of the information literacy level in the students of Qom University of medical sciences”, Qom University od medical sciences Journal, 7 (2), pp. 23-30.
  27. Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. and Yeh, D., (2008), “what drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction”, Computer & education, Vol 50, pp. 1183-1202.
  28. Taherdoost, H., Sahibuddin, S.and Jalaliyoon, N., (2015), “A review paper on e-service; technology concepts”, Procedia Technology 19, pp. 1067- 1074.
  29. Wafaei Najjar, A., Mohammadi, M., Khiabani Tanha, B. And Ebrahimi-Pour, H., (2011), Attitudes and Practice of Faculty Members toward the Implementation of the Virtual Education System in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iranian Journal of Medical Education, Volume 11, Number 2, pp. 120-127. [in Persian]
  30. Wan, Z. (2010), “E-learning inputs, processes, and outcomes: theoretical development and empirical investigations”, PhD thsis, The university of western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada.
  31. Watanabe, K., (2005), “A study on needs for e-learning – through the analysis of national survey and case studies”, Progress in informatics, Vol. 2, pp. 77-86.
  32. Weill, p. & Vital, M., (2003), “place to space: Migrating to eBusiness models”, Harvard Business Press.
  33. Wilson, D., Callaghan, T. & Honore, S., (2000), “e-learning: the future of learning”, elearnity Ltd. Retrieved from http://www.elearnity.com
  34. Zarei Zawaraki, A. And Badriyan M., (2011), Evaluation of E-Learning: A Case Study of Electronic Education in Computer Science, Khaje Nasir-e-Din Tusi University, 6th National Conference and 3rd International Conference on Electronic Learning and training, Tehran. [in Persian]
چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی
دوره 9، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 4
1397
صفحه 119-150