چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی

آسیب‌شناسی نظام ارزشیابی عملکرد کارکنان با رویکردی کیفی (مطالعه موردی: دانشگاه یزد)

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی (با رویکردهای کیفی)

نویسندگان

1 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت بازرگانی- گرایش مدیریت استراتژیک، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران

2 گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران

چکیده

هدف: آسیب‌شناسی نظام ارزشیابی عملکرد کارکنان دانشگاه یزد به علت کارآمدی پایین و کم اثربخش بودن خروجی نظام ارزشیابی و دسته‌بندی مفاهیم (آسیب‌ها) در قالب تم‌های فرعی و اصلی است.
طراحی/روش‌شناسی/رویکرد: روش پژوهش، کیفی و مبتنی بر تحلیل تم است. جامعه آماری پژوهش، مدیران هیئت‌‌علمی، غیرهیئت‌علمی و کارشناسان خبره و متخصص دانشگاه یزد بودند که با روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش مصاحبه نیمه ساختار‌یافته است که با 29 نمونه برگزار شد تا میزان اشباع داده‌ها به دست آید. مصاحبه‌ها ضبط و به‌صورت متنی نوشته شد و با روش تحلیل تم برای توسعه تم‌ها مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفتند. علاوه‌بر‌این، نرم‌افزار Maxqda برای مدیریت داده‌ها مورد استفاده قرار گرفت.
یافته‌های پژوهش: یافته‌های پژوهش شامل 21 تم فرعی است که در قالب 6 تم اصلی دسته‌بندی شده‌اند؛
«زیرساخت فرهنگی»، «چالش‌های طراحی»، «محدودیت‌های رفتاری»، «مسائل اجرایی»، «تعدیل هاله‌ای» و «ناکارآمدی».
محدودیت‌ها و پیامدها: ماهیت کیفی پژوهش منجر به محدودیت در تعمیم نتایج و یافته‌های پژوهش به دیگر شرایط و موقعیت­ها می‌شود. انتخاب هدفمند و قضاوتی اعضای نمونه موجب بروز احتیاط و حساس شدن در ارائه نظرات می‌شود.
پیامدهای عملی: آسیب‌های متعددی بر کیفیت نتایج ارزشیابی عملکرد کارکنان دانشگاه یزد تأثیرگذارند که باید از سوی سیاست‌گذاران ارزشیابی برای بهبود کیفیت فرآیند ارزشیابی مورد توجه قرار گیرند. از بین‌ آسیب‌های شناسایی شده، آسیب‌های روش‌شناختی که با مفهوم چالش‌های طراحی تبیین شده است و شامل هفت مفهوم فرعی است نیاز بیشتری به بهبود دارند.
ابتکار یا ارزش مقاله: مقاله منتج به بهبود کیفیت در تدوین شاخص‌های ارزشیابی عملکرد و دریافت خروجی با اثربخشی بیشتر می‌شود.
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Pathology of Employee Performance Evaluation System with Qualitative Approach; Case Study: Yazd University

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mojgan Sharifian 1
  • mehdi sabokro 2

1 Graduated Master of Business Administration - Strategic Management Trend. Faculty of Economics, Management & Accounting. Yazd University. Yazd. Iran

2 Part of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics, Management & Accounting. Yazd University. Yazd. Iran.

چکیده [English]

Objective: Pathology of Yazd University performance appraisal system due to inefficiency and ineffectiveness of appraisal system output and classification of concepts (injuries) in the form of sub-main and main themes.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The research method is qualitative and based on theme analysis. The statistical population of the study consisted of faculty member and non-faculty member managers, and experts of Yazd University who were selected by purposeful sampling. The research tool was a semi-structured interview with 29 samples to obtain data saturation. The interviews were recorded and transcribed and analyzed using theme analysis to develop themes. In addition, Maxqda software was used for data management.
Findings: The findings of the study consisted of 21 sub-themes that were classified into 6 main themes; “Cultural Infrastructure”, “Design Challenges’’, “Behavioral Limitations”, “Executive Issues”, “Halo Adjustment” and “Inefficiency”.
Constraints and Consequences: The qualitative nature of research results in limitations in generalizing research findings to other situations and situations. Purposeful and judicious selection of sample members makes them cautious and sensitive in providing feedback.
Practical Implications: Numerous damages affect the quality of the evaluation results of Yazd University staff performance, which should be addressed by the evaluation policymakers to improve the quality of the appraisal process. Among the identified damages, the methodological damages, which are explained by the concept of design challenges and include seven sub-concepts, are in great need of improvement.
Initiative or value of the Paper: The article contributes to the improvement of quality in formulating performance evaluation indices and receiving output more effectively.
Paper Type: Research Paper

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Pathology
  • Performance Evaluation
  • Theme Analysis
  • Yazd University
  1. Abtahi, S. H. (2013). Human resource management (from theory to practice), st edition. Tehran. Fujhan Pub (In Persian).
  2. Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2012). Using performance management to win the talent war, Business Horizons, 55(6), 609-616.
  3. Alvi, S., & Qureshi, Z. I. (2011). Performance Appraisal Challenges at Sui National Gas Pipelines Ltd (SNGPL), Asian Journal of Management Cases, 8(1), 61-87.
  4. Armstrong, M. (2009). Armstrong's handbook of performance management: An evidence-based guide to delivering high performance. Kogan Page Publishers.
  5. Behery, M.H., & Paton, A. (2008). Performance Appraisal-Cultural Fit: Organizational Outcomes within the UAE, Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 1(1), 34-49.
  6. Bernardin, H.J. (2003). Human Resource Management: an experiential approach. 3th Edition, New York: Mc GrawHill.
  7. N. (2001). Pathology of Collaborative Management. Tadbir, a Monthly Magazine on Management, 115 (In Persian).
  8. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Ualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77-101.
  9. Esfandiari A, Nekoueimoghadam M, Mohammadi Z, Norouzi S, Amiresmaili M. (2012). Pathology of Human Resources by Applying three Dimensional Model - Case Study: Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Iran. TB; 10 (3 and 3-4), 12-1. (In Persian).
  10. M., & Hook, C. (1999). Introducting Human Resource Management, Longman.
  11. Gholamzadeh, D. (2005). Evaluation of staff performance. Industry Expansion Weekly journal. 108, 9-10. (In Persian).
  12. Gholipour, A., Najafi, T. (2016). Performance Management System Pathology in Small & Medium sized Enterprises of Iran Capital Market the Case: Amin Investment Bank. Journal of Management Improvement. 10(34), 159-179. (In Persian).
  13. Golizadeh, H., & Fard, K. D. (2016). Pathology of implementing staff performance evaluation system in the law of countrywide service management -Case Study: Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance, International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies (IJHCS), 1(1), 2354-2364.
  14. Grossi, L. (2012). Performance Appraisal as a Tool for Efficiency in the Public Sector, Washington DC, Washington University.
  15. Harrison, M.I. (1998). Diagnosing organizations, Methods, Model and Process. By sagc Publication.
  16. Ivancevich, J. M. (2007). Human Resource Management. New York: Mc GrawHill.
  17. Kamali, F., Yamani, N., Changiz, T., & Zoubin, F. (2018). Factors influencing the results of faculty evaluation in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 7
  18. Kahenman, D. (2001). Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Basic Books.
  19. Khastar, H. (2009). Providing a method for calculating the reliability of coding stages in research interviews. The journal of Methodology of social Sciences and Humanities, 15 (58), 161-174. (In Persian).
  20. Loga, P., & Chand, A. (2019). Performance appraisal systems and public sector efficiency in small island developing states. Personnel Review.
  21. Mahdavian, A. (1997). Evaluation of staff performance, work and behavior based capabilities of management, Tehran. State management training center. (In Persian).
  22. Majidi, S., Daneshkohan, A., Zarei, E., & Ashktorab, T. (2020). Perspectives of health workers on annual performance appraisal: A study in primary health care. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 1-8.
  23. Mani, BG. (2002). Performance appraisal systems, productivity and motivation: a case study. Washington: Public Personal Management. 2002; 31(2), 141-160.
  24. Mirsepasi, N., alizadeh, M., feizi, M., ghaderi, E. (2009). Human resource management, 1(1), 1st edition. Tehran. Mir Pub. (In Persian).
  25. Mirzaee, L. (2012). Pathology of Employee Performance Assessment System -Case Study of Azerbaijan Steel Company. (Thesis of msc degree). Islamic Azad University - Central Tehran Branch. (In Persian).
  26. Moosavirad, S., T. Ruzbahani, M., Raveh, M. (2014). Physical education teacher performance evaluation with 360 degree feedback: a case study of city teachers Corp. Journal of Organizational Behavioral Management in Sport Studies. 1(3), 61-70. (In Persian).
  27. Moshabaki, asghar. (2001). Management of organizational Behavior. 2 nd edition. Tehran. Termeh Publication. (In Persian)
  28. Murphy, K. R. (2020). Performance evaluation will not die, but it should. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 13-31.
  29. Najafizadeh, M., & Zahedi, S. M. (2016). Pathology Of Employee Performance Management System At Qazvin University Of Medical Sciences By Using Three- Dimensional, Journal Of Development & Evolution Management, 25, 59 - 69.
  30. Noe, R.A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhurt, B., & Wright, P.M. (2008). Human Resource Management: gaining Competitive advantage. New York: Mc GrawHill.355, 345-347.
  31. A. (2012). A step-by-step guide to deploying performance management. Tehran. Farmanesh pub. (In Persian).
  32. Rani, S., & Sakthivel, R. (2020). On Effective Analysis of Employee Performance Appraisal System in DMI-St. Eugene University, Zambia. International Journal of HR & Organizational Management Insights & Transformations, 5(1).
  33. Seyedi, S.M.R., Danaee Fard, H., Ganjali, A., & Khaef-Elahi, A.A. (2019). Understanding the Effective Environmental Conditions on the Ministerial Performance Evaluation: A Meta-Synthesis. Journal of Public Administration Perspective, 10(2), 71-93. (In Persian).
  34. Sigall, H., & Ostrove, N. (1975). Beautiful but dangerous: effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridic judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(3), 410-414.
  35. Snell, S., A & Bohlander, G. W. (2007). Managing Human Resources. Thomson Publishing Company.
  36. Vaezi, S.K., Afri, A., Nargessian, A., Shams, A. (2019). Designing a Tax System Performance Evaluation Model with Ethical Approach. Journal of Public Administration Perspective, 10(2), 121-158. (In Persian).
چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی
دوره 11، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 43
1399
صفحه 125-146