Public Administration Perspective

Typology of Showcase Performance Types of Governmental Organization Managers and its Consequences by Means of FCM Method

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Lorestan university assistant professor, Management faculty, Korramabad, Iran

2 M.Sc. Student, Faculty of Management , Lorestan university, Khorramabad, Iran.

3 Ph.D. Student, Faculty of Management, Lorestan University, Khorram Abad, Iran.

Abstract

Purpose: In the organizations of developing countries, some managers do not have the necessary competence and try to make themselves appear as competent and justified managers by engaging in external and promotional work and finally cover up their incompetence by displaying a showcase style of performance. Showcase managers are among the managers who cause long-term and irreparable damage to the organization with their performance and non-functional behaviors. Therefore, the current research was carried out with the aim of typology of managers' showcase performance and its consequences in government organizations.
Design/ methodology/ approach:  The present study is applied research in terms of its purpose, and it is exploratory research in terms of gathering information. Also, this research is a type of mixed qualitative and quantitative research based on comparative and inductive philosophy. The statistical population of the present research includes the experts who were selected by the purposeful sampling method and based on the principle of theoretical adequacy. The data collection tool is in the qualitative part of the interview, whose validity and reliability were confirmed using content validity and theoretical validity and intra-coder and inter-coder reliability methods. Also, the data collection tool in the quantitative section is a questionnaire whose validity and reliability were confirmed using content validity and retest reliability. Qualitative data was analyzed by the content analysis method, and quantitative data was analyzed by the fuzzy cognitive mapping method.
Research Findings: The research findings indicate that the use of harvest management tactics, conducting directed and demonstrative organizational citizenship behavior, and rhetorical managers are among the most important showcase functions in government organizations. Also, being on the sidelines of the organizational mission, reducing individual and organizational performance and productivity, and spreading cheating and lying in the organization are among the most important consequences of managers' showcase performance in government organizations.
Limitations & Consequences: Considering the purpose and type of research that should be used from the interview process and experts' opinions, this included the limitation in the number of samples and the difficulty of accessing experts, and there was also the possibility of bias in answering the questions and presenting and recording the findings. Another limitation is that because the statistical population of the present study is the managers of government organizations in Lorestan province, the generalizability of the research results to other societies is limited.
Practical Consequences: Considering that today the emergence of some deviant behaviors by managers in organizations has become a big challenge and because managers, due to their position, are able to create valuable successes and failures for the organization under their management, therefore, selection and appointment Competent managers are one of the significant issues in government organizations. Because it is very likely that at this point it is possible to distinguish between worthy and unworthy managers. Therefore, organizations should identify managers based on their competence and moral qualifications and other considered indicators and prevent their deviant and fake performance and actions in order to cover up their incompetence. Therefore, the present study helps organizations by identifying the types of showcase performance of managers to be aware of such people and to avoid the employment and appointment of incompetent people who only take steps to advance their personal interests and the harmful consequences that are shown in this research. It was pointed out to them to stay safe and finally be able to take an important step towards spreading meritocracy in government organizations.
Innovation or value of the Article: In most governmental and non-governmental organizations, despite a lot of investment to improve performance, achieving high performance levels is slow. One of the main reasons for this problem is showcase performance. This performance style focuses on the performance of performance instead of focusing on actual performance and productivity. In other words, visible performance indicators are taken into consideration by the employees, and this issue causes the evaluation of real performance indicators to be neglected. Therefore, the present research aims to take an important step in the direction of spreading meritocracy and improving performance in government organizations by creating awareness and introducing the types of showcase performance.
Paper Type: Original Paper
 

Keywords

  1. Ameryan, H., Fahimi Nezhad, A., Morsal, B., & Siavashi, M. (2023). A Structural Equation Modeling of Toxic Leadership and Organizational Trauma and Organizational Inertia Considering the Role of Social Loafing among the Ministry of Sport and Youth Staff. Strategic Studies on Youth and Sports, 22(59), 431-450.
  2. Ashgarof, Reza and Amiri, Alinaghi. (2017). Identifying and ranking factors affecting the occurrence of hypocritical behavior in Iran's state companies and providing solutions based on Islamic texts: the case study of Parsian Gas Refinery Company. Management of organizational culture. 16(2). 305-325.(in persian).
  3. Bagheri, Seyyed Kazem. (2016). The role of meritocracy in political justice and its reflection in the Islamic-Iranian model of progress. Al-Taaliyah Policy Quarterly. 19(1): 7-22. (in persian).
  4. Chen, M., & Agrawal, S. (2017). Do communication barriers in student teams impede creative behavior in the long run? A time-lagged perspective, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 154- 167.
  5. Çayak, S. (2021). The mediating role of organizational hypocrisy in the relationship between organizational silence and organizational rumor: a study on educational organizations. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 8(2), 1-13.
  6. Fani, Sheikhinejad, Danai Fard and Hassanzadeh, Ali. (2012). Investigating the factors influencing the formation of political behavior in the organization, public administration. 6 (1): 151-174. (in persian).
  7. Folaadi, Hessam; Sarlak, Mohammad Ali; Hozouri, Mohammad Javad. (2019). Consequences of using showcase performance style in government organizations. Management of government organizations, ninth period, number 1. (in persian).
  8. Garengo, P., & Sardi, A. (2021). Performance measurement and management in the public sector: state of the art and research opportunities. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(7), 1629-1654.
  9. Ghorbani, Ali (2017). Presenting a conceptual framework for processing storefront management theory. Scientific Quarterly Journal of Government Organizations Management. 6(4).152-161. (in persian).
  10. Hadavinejad, Mustafa; Amirkhanlou, Maryam. (2015). Uncovering hypocrisy in the organization using phenomenology: an understanding of multiple perceptions. Scientific Journal of Organizational Culture Management. 14(1). 249-278. (in persian).
  11. Howladar, M. H. R., Rahman, S., & Jewel, M. A. (2018). Deviant workplace behavior and job performance: The moderating effect of transformational leadership. Howlader, MHR Rahman, MS, & Uddin, MA,(2018). Deviant Workplace Behavior and Job Performance: The Moderating Effect of Transformational Leadership, Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 11(1), 147-183.
  12. Ilsev, A., & Aydin, E. M. (2021). Leader Hypocrisy and Its Emotional, Attitudinal, and Behavioral Consequences. In Destructive Leadership and Management Hypocrisy (pp. 129-141). Emerald Publishing Limited.
  13. Karimian, Mohammad; Safari, Saeed; and Khosravi, Ali. (2014). Measuring the organization's performance based on human resource management indicators using fuzzy MADM techniques (Case study: Organizations affiliated to Isfahan Municipality). Public Administration. 7(1). 183-153. (in persian).
  14. Liu, M. and Rao, P. (2015). A comparative perspective of knowledge management via social media: India and China. The Learning Organization, 22(2), 93-114.
  15. Marashi Seyedjavad; Hassanpour, Akbar; Jafarnia, Saeed; and Vakili, Yusuf. Presenting the formation model of the phenomenon of organizational forgetfulness in government organizations. Resource management in the police force. 9(3). 127-160. (in persian).
  16. Miri Rami, Sayedeh Fatemeh; Delgoshai, Yalda; and Mahmoudi, Amirhossein. (2019). Presenting the model of strategic intelligence of the managers of education districts in Tehran with the theoretical approach of the Foundation. Islamic lifestyle with a focus on health. 4(3). 139-150. (in persian).
  17. Nasrasafhani, Ali; Heydari Aghagoli, Parisa. (2018). The effect of workplace jealousy on employees' deviant behavior. Improvement and transformation management studies. 28(91). 119-138. (in persian).
  18. Ozer F & Cihan T. Effect of Strategic Leadership Style on Firm Performance: A Study in a Turkish SME. Precedia-Social and Behhavioral Sciences 2014; 15:778-784.
  19. Philip, O. A., Ishaq, M. F., Kola, A. A. (2023). Effects of recruitment and selection process on performance in organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management and Humanities, 1(1), 1–26.
  20. Pourghafari, Seyed reza., Manzari Tavakoli, Alireza., Salajeghe, Sanjar., Dehghani Soltani, Mehdi; & Ebrahiminejad, Mehdi. (2023). A Study on the Dimensions of Employee Voice in GovernmentOwned Banks (Case Study: Headquarters of Agricultural Bank and its Branches in Tehran). Public Management Researches, 15 (58), 209-232. (in Persian)
  21. Padilla, Y., Yang, J. & Mossholder, K.W. (2021). Identify and explain the antecedents of poisonous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 50-63.
  22. Pour Abbas, Alireza; Dostar, Mohammad; and Gudarzvand Chegini, Mehrdad. (2017). The effect of knowledge sharing on organizational performance, with the mediation of intellectual capital in the social security organization of Gilan province. Journal of Human Capital Empowerment. 1(1). 37-47. (in persian).
  23. Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35(3), 718-804.
  24. Salahipour, Vahideh and Ziaaldini, Mohammad. (2022). Identifying and ranking the factors affecting the emergence of showcase management in Sarcheshme copper complex. Transformational human resources. first round. Number 3. (in persian).
  25. Valizadeh, Yokabed; Koshki Jahormi, Alireza; Saadi, Mohammadreza (2023). Evaluating the effects of showcase performance in the sustainability of two-dimensional learning by using intuitive fuzzy analysis, public management research. 16(60). 134-97. (in persian).
  26. Yaqoubi, Noor Mohammad; Shokohi, Javad; Raisi Shahravi, Hafsa; and Sidi, Farzaneh. (2014). Examining the influence of leadership styles on organizational performance with the mediators of organizational learning and innovation. Change management research paper. 7(14). 32-56. (in persian).
  27. Valizadeh, Youkabed; kuoshki jahromi, Alireza; & saadi, Mohammad reza. (2023). Presentation drivers of showcase performance model in government organizations. Career and Organizational Counseling, 15(1), 119-148. (in persian).
Public Administration Perspective
Volume 15, Issue 2 - Serial Number 58
2024
Pages 169-190