نوع‌شناسی رفتار سازمانی کارکنان خشنود سازمان‌های فرهنگی براساس ابعاد باورمندی و انواع رفتارفردی

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی (با رویکردهای آمیخته)

نویسندگان

1 دکتری، مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی فرهنگی، گرایش فرهنگ سازمانی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران.

2 گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران.

3 گروه مدیریت فرهنگی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: هدف نوشتار حاضر نوع شناسی رفتار سازمانی کارکنان خشنود سازمانهای فرهنگی بر اساس ابعاد باورمندی و انواع رفتار فردی است.
طراحی/ روششناسی/ رویکرد: جامعه هدف کارکنان سازمانهای فرهنگی کشور بودند که در راستای تحقیق، کارکنان سازمانهای فرهنگی 4 استان، شامل 2750 نفر به منزله جامعه آماری انتخاب شدند و حجم نمونه بر اساس فرمول کوکران 243 نفر محاسبه شد. شیوۀ پژوهش آمیخته و نمونه گیری مرحله کمی تصادفی و ابزار آن، پرسش‌نامه‌های باورمندی محقق ساخته، رضایت‌سنجی مینه‌سوتا (2000) و رفتار پویای اشفورد و بلک (1996) بود. بر این ‌اساس، ابتدا نمونه ها در 4 گروه تفکیک شد و سپس با 34 نفر از آن‌ها مصاحبه شد. نمونه گیری مرحله کیفی، هدفمند و جمع آوری داده ها، به کمک مصاحبه نیمه باز بر اساس رهیافت نئوپوزیتیویستی و تحلیل داده‌ها به شیوه کدگذاری باز انجام شد. ضمناً روایی و پایایی ابزار فاز کمی پژوهش مطلوب بود و به کمک قابلیت اعتبار، انتقال، اتکاء، تأیید و ره‌آورد، اعتماد و پایایی مصاحبه ها اثبات شد.
 یافته های پژوهش: نتایج نشان داد در بین کارکنان خشنود، نمونه های باورمند، دارای احساس عزت‌نفس و رفتارهای فرانقشی هستند، اما گروهی تمایل شدید به انزوا و گوشه گیری دارند. در مقابل، کارکنان ناباورمند ضمن ترس و تسلیم و تعلق سالوسانه سازمانی، به سازوکارهای دفاعی چون پاره‌سازی، واکنش وارونه، تخیل اسکیزوئیدی و فرونشانی متوسل می‌شوند.
محدودیتها و پیامدها: از جمله محدودیت های این پژوهش مقطعی بودن آن است. قطعاً تحقیقات طولی، غنای بیشتر نتایج را درپی خواهد داشت.
پیامدهای عملی: چارچوب پیشنهادی به مدیران و برنامه ریزان سازمان های فرهنگی کمک میکند ضمن شناخت دقیق کارکنان خشنود سازمان و پیش بینی رفتار آنها، علل ایجابی آن را درک و در برنامه ریزی ها لحاظ کنند.
ابتکار یا ارزش مقاله: ارائه مدل سنجش باورمندی سازمانی، شیوه تلفیق داده های کمی و کیفی و نیز فراهم کردن چارچوبی برای بررسی سطح باورها و نوع رفتار فردی کارکنان سازمانها از ابتکارات این پژوهش است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

typology of organizational behavior of pleasure employees in cultural institutions based on the dimensions of believable and types of individual behavior

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amir Keyvanara 1
  • Akbar Etebarian 2
  • Ali Rashidpour 3

1 Ph.D, Cultural Management and Planning, Organizational Culture, Faculty of Management, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Department of Public Management, Faculty of Management, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch, Isfahan, Iran.

3 Department of Cultural Management, Faculty of Management, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch, Isfahan, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Purpose:The purpose of this article was the typology of organizational behavior of pleasure employees in cultural institutions based on the dimensions of believable and types of individual behavior.
Design/ Methodology/ Approach: The target population of this study was the employees of cultural organizations in the country. For the study, 2750 people, were selected as the statistical population and the sample size was 243 people. The research method was mixed and random quantitative sampling with researcher-made believer questionnaires, minnesota satisfaction questionnaire (2000) and ashford and black dynamic behavior (1996) tools. Accordingly, first, the samples were divided into 4 groups and then 34 of them were interviewed in the qualitative phase. Qualitative sampling was targeted and data collection were semi-open interview based on neo-positivist approach and data analysis was performed by open coding method. In addition, the validity and reliability of the quantitative and qualitative phase tools were favorable, assurance and reliability.
Research Findings: The results showed that among pleasure employees, believable samples have self-esteem and extra-role behaviors, however, a group has a strong tendency to isolation and loneliness. Meanwhile, unbelievable employees, during fear and surrender and hypocrite affiliation, they resort to defense mechanisms such as separation, reverse, schizoid imagination, and suppression.
Limitations & Consequences: One of the limitations of this research is its cross-sectional nature. Certainly longitudinal research will enriched the results.
Practical Consequences: The proposed framework helps managers and planners of cultural organizations, while identifying the pleasure employees of the organization and predicting their behavior, understand its positive reasons and include them in human resource planning.
Innovation or value of the Article: This research provides a framework for researchers to examine the level of believable and the type of individual behavior of pleasure employees of organizations by presenting a model for measuring organizational credibility and a new way of combining quantitative and qualitative data.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Organizational behavior
  • Pleasure employees
  • Believable organization
  • Unbelievable organization
  • Active behavior
  • Passive behavior
  1. Armstrong, M. (2016). Service Compensation Management, translated by Seyed Reza Seyed Javadin, Behrouz Purwali and Elham Jamali. Tehran: Mehraban Book Institute. (in Persian)
  2. Arvand, H. (2020). Investigating the relationship between organizational commitment and job satisfaction with the desire to leave the job among education staff in Charam city. Master Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Gachsaran Branch . (in Persian)
  3. Arvey RD, Bouchard TJ, Segal NL, Abraham LM. (2019). Job satisfaction: Environmental and genetic components. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74:187-192.
  4. Ashford J,S. Black, J, S. (1996). Proactivity During Organizational Entry: The Role of Desire for Control. Journal of Applied Psychology (American Psychological Association Inc),81(2):199-214.
  5. Aydin B, Ceylan A. (2009).The effect of spiritual leadership on organizational learning capacity. African Journal of Business management,3(5):184-190
  6. Azad Armaki, T. (2014). Sociological Theories. Tehran: Soroush (Radio and Television Publications). (in Persian)
  7. Baret, S. R. (2009). Theory and method in anthropology for students. Translated by Shahed Saeedi, Tehran: Cultural Research Office. (in Persian)
  8. Belfiore, E. (2015). Impact, value and bad economics: Making sense of the problem of value in the arts and humanities. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 14(1) , 95-110.
  9. Bunk A, P, Van Waegt, M (2015). User Social Psychology: From Problems to Solutions. Translated by Majid Saffarnia and Parasto Hassanzadeh. Tehran: Wirayesh Publications. (in Persian).
  10. Crant, AM., Parker, SK., Collins, CG. (2009). Getting credit for proactive behavior: supervisor reactions depend on what you value and how you feel. Personnel Psychology,62(1):31-55.
  11. Crant, JM. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3): 435-462.
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
  13. Daft, R.F (2013). Fundamentals of Theory and Design of Organization, translated by Seyed Mohammad Aarabi and Ali Parsaiyan. Tehran: Cultural Research Office. (in Persian)
  14. Davidson M, Manning M, Timo N. (2001). Are Customer Satisfaction and Performance in Hotels Influenced by Organizational Climate? Proceedings of 2001 CAUTHE National Research Conference.
  15. Davis, S, M.(1985). Managing corporate culture. Cambridge, Mass: Harper, Ballinger Division.
  16. Denzin, N. (1988). The research act: theoretical introduction to sociological Methods. New York: McGraw- Hill.
  17. Ebrahimi Loye, A, Mirzaei Rajeuni, S (2018). Qualitative research in the social sciences. Tehran: Loye Publishing. (in Persian)
  18. Fisher, C, (2009). Happiness at work. International journal of management reviews: Online: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/business -pubs/304.
  19. Flick, U. (2019). An Introduction to Qualitative Research, translated by Hadi Jalili, Tehran, Ney Publications. (in Persian)
  20. Frese M, Garst H, Fay D.(2007). Making things happen: reciprocal rela- tionships between work characteristics and personal initiative in a four-wave longitudinal structural equation model. J Appl Psychol. 92 (4):1084-102.
  21. Fuller B, Marler LE. (2009). Change driven by nature: A metaanalytic review of the proactive personality literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75: 329-345.
  22. George JM, Jones GR.(2008). Understanding and managing organizational behavior, Fifth Edition, Pearson/Prentice Hall, Newjersey.
  23. Golchin, A., Hadizadeh Moghadam, A., Amirkhani, T., & Tabarsa, Gh.A. (2020). Identifying the Dimensions of Employees' Well-Being in Iran; Case: Payment Service Providers. Journal of Public Administration Perspective, 11(1), 15-37. (in Persian)
  24. Guba, E.G., Lincoln, Y.S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. ECTJ 30, 233–252.
  25. Grube, J.W., Mayton, D.M., II and Ball‐Rokeach, S.J. (1994) , Inducing Change in Values, Attitudes, and Behaviors: Belief System Theory and the Method of Value Self‐ Journal of Social Issues, 50: 153-173.
  26. Hackman JR , Oldham GR. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organization Behav Hum Performance; 16 (2):250-279.
  27. Hasitschka W, Tschmuck P, Zembylas T. (2010). Cultural Institutions Studies: Investigating the Transformation of Cultural Goods Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society, Vol. 35(2): 147-158
  28. Hatch, M.J. (2008). Organization theory: symbolic and postmodern interpretation. Translated by Hassan Danaeifard, Tehran: Afkar Publishing. (in Persian)
  29. Hayter, M. (1999), Burnout and AIDS care‐related factors in HIV community Clinical Nurse Specialists in the North of England. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29: 984-993.
  30. Hodaei, M., Alvani, S.M., Yazdani, H.R., Zarei Matin, H. (2020). Coopetitive (Cooperation and Competition) Advantage in Public Organizations: Synergy of People and Process. Journal of Public Administration Perspective, 11(2), 15-33.
  31. Holme JJ, Rangel VS. (2012). Putting School Reform in Its Place: Social Geography, Organizational Social Capital, and School Performance. American Educational Research,49(2):257-283
  32. Jean R, Sinkovics R, Kim, D. (2017). Antecedents and Outcomes of Supplier Innovativeness in International Customer–Supplier Relationships: The Role of Knowledge Distance. MIR: Management International Review, 57(1), 121-151.
  33. Khajehpour, N, Bashlideh, K, Baharloo, M (2018). The relationship between dismissal in the workplace with job performance, organizational citizenship behavior and intention to leave the job; The mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Psychological Achievements, 24 (2), 137-160. (in Persian)
  34. Khalifa ED, Truong Q. (2010). The Relationship between Employee Perceptions of Equity and Job Satisfaction in the Egyptian Private Universities. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 3 (5):135-150.
  35. Kowsar, W, A. (2019). Predicting responsibility based on job satisfaction and emotional commitment among Eghlid school teachers. Master Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Arsanjan Branch. (in Persian)
  36. Lussier, R. N. (2006). Management Fundamentals: Concepts, Applications, Skill Development. United Kingdom: Thomson/South-Western.
  37. Lussier, R. N. (2006). Management Fundamentals: Concepts, Applications, Skill Development. United Kingdom: Thomson/South-Western.
  38. Maslow AH. (1998). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers.
  39. Mukherjee, R., Sathi, B. (2001). Art of Bengal, Kolkata: Centre of International Modern Art Gallery.
  40. Naami, A,Z, Zargar, Y. (2009). Identifying job stressors and examining the relationship between these factors and job satisfaction of employees of an industrial company. Psychological Studies, 4 (1), 30-39. (in Persian)
  41. Nayini, A,M. (2011). An Introduction to Cultural Management. Tehran, Saghi Publications. (in Persian)
  42. Oskamp, S. (2000). Reducing prejudice and discrimination. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  43. Rafiian, M. (2014). Investigating the relationship between some personal factors and employees' occupational work. Master Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Garmi Branch. (in Persian)
  44. Rezaei, S. H (2017). The Relationship between Job Adjustment and Job Satisfaction with Mental Health of Fars General Directorate of Sports and Youth. Master Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Arsanjan Branch. (in Persian)
  45. Rezaeian, A. (2020). Fundamentals of Organizational Behavior Management. Tehran: Organization for the Study and Compilation of Humanities Books (SAMT). (in Persian)
  46. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. (2007). Organizational behavior (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
  47. Robbins, S. P (2020). Organization Theory, Organizational Structure and Design. translated by Seyed Mehdi Alwani and Hassan Danaeifard. Tehran: Saffar Publications. (in Persian)
  48. Rollinson, D., Broadfield, A. & Edwards, D.J. (2005). Organisational Behaviour and Analysis: An Integrated Approach (3rd Ed). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
  49. Rusbult, C. E., Farrell, D., Rogers, G., & Mainous, G. A. (1988). Impact of Exchange Variables on Exit, Voice, Loyaltyand Neglect: an integrative Model of o Declining Job Satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 599-627.
  50. Saatchi, M. (2015). Fundamentals of Organizational Behavior (Organizational Behavior and Productivity with Indigenous Attitudes), Tehran, Wirayesh Publications. (in Persian)
  51. Salehi Amiri, R. (2014). Culture and Management of Cultural Organizations, Tehran, Expediency Discernment Council. Strategic Research Center, Research and Cultural Group. (in Persian)
  52. Santana B L, Figueredo J S, Bittencourt R A. (2018). "Motivation of Engineering Students with a Mixed-Contexts Approach to Introductory Programming," 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), San Jose, CA, USA , pp. 1-9, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2018.8659158.
  53. Sarukhani, B (2015). Research methods in social sciences. Tehran, Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2 vols. (in Persian)
  54. Schermerhorn JR., James GH, Richard NO. (2021). Organizational Behavior. 13 Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  55. Shertzer, B. (1985). Career Planning. Boston. Houghton Mifflin College.
  56. Shine, A. (2005). Organizational Culture Management and Leadership, translated by Borzoo Farehy buzanjani, Shamsuddin Nouri Najafi, Tehran: Simaye Javan Publications. (in Persian)
  57. Soltani, E. (2015). Productivity of human resources, Isfahan, Arkan Publications. (in Persian)
  58. Sprogis, U .(2011). Human Nature; Noble Booksellers, Inc. New York.
  59. Statistics Center of Iran (2016). Socio-economic status of the country in 2015, Tehran, Iran Statistics Center Publications. (in Persian)
  60. Stride T. (2007). Personal correlates of job satisfaction: Empirical evidence from UK universities. International Journal of Social Economics, 3020/12, 1210– 1232.
  61. Stripek D. (2002). Motivation to Learn. Integrating Theory and Practice: Allyn & Bacon.
  62. Tan T H, Waheed, A. (2011). Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory and job satisfaction in the malaysian retail sector: the mediating effect of love of money. Published in: Asian Academy of Management Journal , Vol. 16(1), 73-94.
  63. USAID: The United States Agency for International Development. (2012). Demographic and Health Survey Sampling and Household Listing Manual. ICF International Calverton. Maryland USA September.
  64. Vermeir P, Blot S, Degroote S, Vandijck D, Mariman A, Vanacker T, Peleman R, Verhaeghe R, Vogelaers, D. (2018). Communication satisfaction and job satisfaction among critical care nurses and their impact on burnout and intention to leave: A questionnaire study. Intensive & critical care nursing, 48, 21–27
  65. Wang W, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Ma J. (2020). Spillover of workplace IT satisfaction onto job satisfaction: The roles of job fit and professional fit. International Journal of Information Management, 50: 341-352
  66. Wang, KL, Johnson A, Nguyen H, Goodwin RE, Groth M. (2019). The Changing Value of Skill Utilisation: Interactions with Job Demands on Job Satisfaction and Absenteeism. Applied Psychology. 69(1), 5-29.
  67. Hirschfeld, R. (2000). Does Revising the Intrinsic and Extrinsic Subscales of the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form Make a Difference?. Educational and Psychological Measurement - EDUC PSYCHOL MEAS. 60. 255-270.
  68. Weinstein, N. D. (1993). Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior. Health Psychology. 12 (4): 324-333.
  69. Wibowo, G. (2017). Comparison of the Models of Organizational Behavior: A Review. Management and Economics Research Journal, 2: 32-40.
  70. Wirihana, L, Welch, A, Williamson M, Christensen M, Bakon S, Craft, J. (2018). Using Colaizzi’s method of data analysis to explore the experiences of nurse academics teaching on satellite campuses. Nurse Researcher. 25. 30-34.
  71. Zarei, R. (2017). Relationship between managerial styles and quality of work life with job satisfaction of Rostam education school principals. Master Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht Branch. (in Persian)
  72. Ziari, H. (2007). Principles and methods of regional planning, Yazd, Yazd University. (in Persian).