چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی

مدل‌سازی ساختاری تفسیری اجرای خط‌مشی‌های قضایی با رویکردی آمیخته اکتشافی

نوع مقاله : مستخرج از رساله

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران

2 دانشیارگروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران

3 استادیارگروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران.

4 دانشیار گروه مدیریت فرهنگی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران

چکیده

هدف: نهاد قضایی نقش گسترده و مؤثری در اجرای خط‌مشی‌های عمومی مرتبط دارد، گستردگی وظایف ترسیم‌شده نشانگر این است که با اجرای دامنه وسیعی از خط‌مشی‌ها در حوزه‌های مختلف درگیر است، بنابراین، اجرای خط‌مشی‌های قضایی علاوه بر سازمان موردمطالعه سایر جامعه را درگیر می‌کند. با توجه به اهمیت اجرای خط‌مشی‌های قضایی، این پژوهش باهدف شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی عوامل کلیدی اجرای خط‌مشی‌های قضایی انجام‌شده است.
طراحی/روش‌شناسی/رویکرد: این پژوهش به روش آمیخته انجام‌شده است. در بخش کیفی، مشارکت‌کنندگان 26 نفر از خبرگانی بوده‌اند که درزمینه اجرای خط‌مشی‌های قضایی از دانش و تجربه علمی برخوردارند و با روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته هست و مصاحبه‌ها تا مرحله اشباع نظری ادامه پیدا کرد. در این مرحله ابتدا از روش تحلیل مضمون برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل و کدگذاری مصاحبه‌ها استفاده شد. سپس برای غربالگری مفاهیم استخراج‌شده از رویکرد دلفی فازی استفاده شد. در بخش کمی جامعه آماری پژوهش قضات، کارشناسان، مدیران عملیاتی و مدیران دفاتر شاغل در دادگستری‌ها به تعداد 17000 نفر بود که با استفاده از فرمول کوکران و روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه‌ای، تعداد 375 نفر به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب گردید. روایی پرسشنامه از طریق روایی واگرا و همگرا و پایایی آن از طریق آلفای کرونباخ (873/0) تأیید شد. داده‌ها با کمک نرم افزا Smart PLS3 از طریق مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری (SEM) برازش شد. درنهایت با استفاده از روش مدل‌سازی ساختاری تفسیری، پس از مشخص شدن سطوح هرکدام از عوامل و با در نظر گرفتن ماتریس در دسترس‌پذیری نهایی، مدل نهایی در چهار سطح ارائه گردید.
یافته‌های پژوهش: پس از تجزیه‌وتحلیل یافته‌ها، 122 شاخص، 36 مؤلفه و 8 بعد شامل سیاست‌های اجرا، تقویت بستر بازیگران اجرا، روابط انسانی–اخلاقی با ارباب‌رجوع، شهروندان، ویژگی شخصی قضات، حکمرانی قضایی شبکه‌ای، ساختار اجرا و توانمندسازی نیروی انسانی احصاء شد. با توجه به نتایج مدل ساختاری تفسیری دو بعد سیاست‌های اجرا و تقویت بستر بازیگران اجرا اولویت نخست خبرگان و به‌عنوان تأثیرگذارترین سطح مدل می‌باشند. این به معنای آن است که تمرکز بر این دو بعد شایسته توجه ویژه‌ای است.
محدودیت‌ها و پیامدها: استفاده از مصاحبه برای استخراج مفاهیم در بخش کیفی، پرسشنامه برای سنجش مفاهیم استخراج‌شده در بخش کمی و عدم امکان تعمیم‌پذیری نتایج پژوهش به همه جوامع ازجمله محدودیت‌های این پژوهش تلقی می‌شود.
پیامدهای عملی: معرفی ابعاد مدل اجرای خط‌مشی‌های قضایی، خلق ادبیات جدید در خصوص اجرای خط‌مشی‌های قضایی
ابتکار یا ارزش مقاله: ابتکار اصلی پیشنهاد به اجرای عملی عناصر مدل ارائه‌شده است.
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) of the Implementing Judicial Policies with a Mixed exploratory Approach

نویسندگان [English]

  • neda keshvarianazad 1
  • Akbar Etebarian 2
  • mehraban hadi paykani 3
  • mojtaba shahnoushi 4

1 . Ph D Student Department of Public Administration , Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

2 Associate Prof Department of Public Administration, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch , Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

3 Assistant Prof Department of Public Administration, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.

4 Associate Prof Department of cultural management, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

چکیده [English]

Purpose: The judicial institution has an extensive and effective role in the implementation of related public policies, The extent of the tasks outlined is indicative of this which is involved in the implementation of a wide range of policies in Different fields. Therefore, the implementation of judicial policies involves the rest of the society in addition to the studied organization. Due to the importance of the implementation of judicial policies, this research was conducted with the aim of identifying and prioritizing the key factors of the implementation of judicial policies.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This research was done in a mixed method. In the qualitative part, the participants were 26 experts who have scientific knowledge and experience in the field of judicial policy implementation and were selected by purposeful sampling. The data collection tool was a semi-structured interview and the interviews continued until the theoretical saturation stage. At this step, the method of analyzing the interviews was thematic analysis. Then the fuzzy Delphi approach was used to screen the concepts. In the quantitative step of the statistical population of the research, there were 17000 judges, experts, operational managers and office managers working in the courts. Using Cochran's formula and classified random sampling method, 375 people were selected as a sample. The validity of the questionnaire was confirmed through convergent and divergent validity and its reliability was confirmed through cronbach's alpha (0.873). Data were analyzed with the help of Smart PLS3 software through Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Using the interpretive structural modeling method, after determining the levels of each factor and considering the final accessibility matrix, the final model was presented in four levels.
Research Findings: From the analysis of the results, 122 indicators, 36 components and 8 dimensions of implementation policies, participation of implementation actors, human-ethical relations with clients, citizens, personal characteristics of judges, network governance in the justice system, implementation structure and human power empowerment were calculated. According to the results of the interpretive structural model, the two dimensions of implementation policies and participation of implementation actors were the first priority of experts and as the most effective level of the model. This means that focusing on these two dimensions deserves special attention.
Limitations & Consequences: Using of interviews to extract concepts in the qualitative part, questionnaires to measure the concepts extracted in the quantitative part, and the impossibility of generalizing the research results to all societies are among the limitations of this research.
Practical Consequences: Introducing the dimensions of the judicial policy implementation model, creating new literature regarding the implementation of judicial policies.
Innovation or value of the Article: The main initiative is to propose the practical implementation of the elements of the presented model.
Paper Type: Research Article

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Implementation
  • Judicial policie
  • Interpretive Structural Modelling
  • Judiciary
  1. Ali Abadi E, Azizi M, Alam Tabrizi A, Davari A (2017). Identifying obstacles to the implementation of entrepreneurship and innovation policies in the development programs of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Quarterly Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Human Sciences. Volume 8. Number 3. pp. 132-95. (in Persian).
  2. Ahadzadeh A, Sayadshirkesh S S, Jamshidi Ivanki M (2019). Factors affecting the effectiveness of the implementation of public policies: a case study of the Ministry of Energy. Journal of Energy Planning and Policy Studies. Number 21: pp. 167-205. (in Persian).
  3. Attri r, Dev n, Sharma v.(2013). Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) approach: An Overview. Research Journal of Management Sciences, 2(2): pp. 6.
  4. Attride-Stirling, J. (2010). “Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool for Qualitative Research”, Qualitative Research, Vol 1, No 3, Pp 385-405.
  5. Basic Studies Research Institute(2021) Assessing Judicial Corruption in Central America and Panama and Mechanisms against with that, Translator: Aali, Somayeh, Publishers: Judiciary Research Institute, Judiciary Press and Publishing Center Tehran(in Persian).
  6. Braun V, Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology journal, 3(2): 77-101.
  7. Bolaji S D, Evans G C, Cary J.(2016). University basic education policy implementation in Nigera. Kedi Journal of Educational Policy. Korean Educational Development Istitute, 13:2: pp 137-158.
  8. Coleman, Anna, Billings, Jenny, Allen, Pauline, Mikelyte, Rasa, Croke, Sarah, Maciness, Julie, Checkland, Kath.(2021). Ambiguity and Conflict In Policy Implementation the Case of the New Care Models Programme in England, Society Policy, Vol.50, No.2, pp: 285-304.
  9. Dergiades T H, Milas C. Mossialos E. Panagiotidis T.(2020). Effectiveness of government policies in response to the COVID-19 outbreak, SSRN Electronic Journal:pp 1-22.
  10. Evans C, Gareth R, Taylor C. Wright C. (2019). ‘Widening Access’ to higher education: the reproduction of university hierarchies through policy enactment. Journal of Education Policy. 34(1):pp101-116.
  11. FitzGerald C, Malley E, Broin D.2019. Policy success/policy failure: A framework for understanding policy choices. Administration, volum. 67, no. 2 (2019), pp. 1–24 doi: 10.2478/admin-2019-0011.
  12. Gharabaghi M, Moghimi S M, Latifi M (2021). Metasynthesis of public policy implementation studies in Iran. Journal of Public Policy. Volume 7. Number 3. Pages 260-243. (in Persian).
  13. Guba E G. Lincoln Y S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research, Handbook of qualitative research, London CA: Sage.
  14. Hudson B, Hunter D, Peckham S. ( 2019). "Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: can policy support programs help? Policy Design and Practice, 2(1):pp 1-14.
  15. Johanson, Jan-Erik. (2018). Strategy formation and policy making in government.
  16. Judiciary Research Institute(2020), Judicial Ethics Charter; United States of America, Translation; Shakuri Fard, Shoueleh, Publishers: Judiciary Research Institute, Judiciary Press and Publishing Center Tehran(in Persian),
  17. Kamali Y, Sheikhzadeh Joshani S, Ahmadinejad F (2018). implementation of public policies; Providing criteria for the successful implementation of policies. Journal of Public Policy. Volume 6. Number 2. 275-253 (in Persian).
  18. Kasbdoust A, Daneshfard K, Gholamreza Memarzadeh Tehran G,(1401) Predicting Organizational Productivity: Pathology of Implementation Gap Human Capital Management Policy (Case Study: Ministry of Interior),Public Administration Perspaective, Vol 13 (1401), No: 2 (Summer), Pages: 141-159,(in Persian).
  19. Kazemi Nejad S (2017). Designing a model for the implementation of energy policies in the oil and gas sector. Doctoral thesis of Islamic Azad University, Tehran Branch. (in Persian).
  20. Kotnik Z, Umek L, Kovac P, Stanimirovic D, & Vintar M. 2020. Analysis of the Key Factors for Successful Public Policy Implementation: A Qualitative Study in Slovenia. DANUBE, 11(2), 113-140.
  21. Masoumi Z, Sanei M, Hamtian Hadi (2018). Providing a model for the effective implementation of the country's health system policies. journal of management strategies in the health system. Volume 4. Number 12. pp. 125-135 (in Persian).
  22. Mirghfouri H, Karimi Goghari Z, Shabani A (2015). Designing a strategic model to improve the quality level of public library services with the interpretive structural modeling approach and MICMAC (case study of Yazd public libraries). journal of information research and public libraries. Volume 22, Number 4: pp. 583-601 (in Persian).
  23. McIsaac J L D, Spencer R, Chiasson K, Kontak J, Kirk S F. (2019). Factors influencing the implementation of nutrition policies in schools: a scoping review. Health Education & Behavior, 46(2):pp 224- 250.
  24. Metcalf, G.S. Kijima, K. & Deguchi, H. (2019). Handbook of Systems Sciences: Springer Singapore, Imprint: Springer.
  25. Momen Kashani, N., Rahnavard, F., Mortazavi, M., Shirazi, M. (2020). A model for measuring the willingness of policy makers to open government in Iran. Public Administration Perspaective, 11(2), 35-64. doi: 10.29252/jpap.2020.96726 (In Persian)
  26. Mugambwa J , Nabeta N, Ngoma M, Rudaheranwa, N, Kaberuka W, Munene J. (2018). Policy Implementation: Conceptual Foundations, Accumulated Wisdom and New Directions. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 8, 211.
  27. Nyhagen G.M. Bleiklie I. Hope K. (2017) Policy Instruments in European Universities: Implementation of Higher Education Policies. In: Bleiklie I.Enders J. Lepori B. (eds) Managing Universities.
  28. Public and International Law Research Institute (2014). Laws and policies in the preparation of judicial bills. Publisher of Judiciary Press and Publishing Center. (in Persian).
  29. Pourahmadi, M, Mokhtarianpour, M; Hasanghali Pouryasuri, T (2018), Pathology of implementation of privatization policies in Iran, Public Management(Management knowledge) Quarterly,  333 -356 (in Persian)
  30. Samadzadeh, M., Giourian, H., Rabiee M., Mohammad R., Hashemzadeh Khorasgani, Gh. (2020). Provide a strategic policy model for IT outsourcing. Public Management Perspectives, 11 (4). (In Persian).
  31. Seyyed Abbaszadeh, Mi,. Amani S B, Javad; Kh A, Hayman and Pashvi, Q(2013). An introduction to structural equation PLS modeling and its application to behavioral sciences, Volume1, Urmia University Publications, p. 159
  32. Sætren, Harald, & Hupe, Peter L. (2018). Policy Implementation in an Age of Governance.
  33. Saetren H.(2005). Facts and myths about research on public policy, implementation policy studies journal,Volum 33,Issue4:pp 559-582.
  34. Singh M D, Kant R.(2011). Knowledge management barriers: An interpretive structural modeling approach. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 3(2), 10.
  35. Skarica M.(2020). Implemntation of TheStrategy For Public Administration Development In Crotia.2015-2020. A Mid-Term Evaluation. Croatia: Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb.
  36. Soti A. Goel RK. Shankar R. Kaushal O P.(2010).Modeling The Enablers of Six Sigma Using Iterpreting Structural Modeling. Journal of Modeling In Management.5(2): 124-141.
  37. Stommel M.2004. Wills CE, clinical research: concepts and principles for advanced practice nurses. Philadelphia. lippincott Williams and wilkins, 2004.
  38. Teddliy C, F.Yu. 2007. Mixed Methods Sampling: ATypology With Exampies.Journal of Mixed Methods RESEARCH: pp 77-100.
  39. Tuokuu F X, Idemudia U, GruberJ S Jean Kayira J.(2018). Challenges and opportunities for implementing environmental policies: Empirical evidence from the gold mining sector in Ghana: Insights from a Qmethodology study. Environmental Science and Policy, 97,p 106–115.
  40. Weible Ch, Nohrstedt D. Cairney P. Carter D. Crow D. Durnova A.(2020). COVID-19 and the policy sciences: Initial reactions and perspectives, Nature Public Health Emergency Collection, 18(1):pp 1-17.
  41. Wu J, Zuidema C, Gugere l K, Roo G.( 2017). Mind the gap! Barriers and implementation deficiencies of energy policies at the local scale in urban China, Energy Policy
  42. Young E, Quinn L.( 2002). Writing effective public policypapers: A guide for policy advisers in Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest: Open Society Institute. Budapest.
  43. Zainudin M Z. (2021). Social Policy Implementation in Malaysia and Its Impact on the Community. In Social Policy in the Islamic World (pp. 263-278). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
  44. Zaini Vandemghadam R, Bagherzadeh M R, Qolipour Kanani Y, Matani M, Aref Nejad M (2021),Designing the implementation model of the policies of the Ministry of Education using interpretive structural modeling method. Journal of Public Policy. Volume 12. Number 42. P.84-62. (in Persian).
  45. Zairsabt F, Dostar M, Memarzadeh G, Albarzi M (2019). The model of good implementation of the general policies of the administrative system with reference to the law, quarterly magazine of the macro and strategic policies. Volume 9. Number 34. Pages 390-416. (in Persian).
  46. Zabet Pourkordi H (2017). Designing the implementation model of the country's higher education policies. Doctoral dissertation of Semnan University. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences (in Persian).
چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی
دوره 14، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 55
1402
صفحه 89-132