چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی

مفهوم پردازی از درست مایگی برای مهار پدیده فساد اداری

نوع مقاله : مقاله مروری

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، مدیریت دولتی، گرایش منابع انسانی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تهران مرکز، تهران، ایران

2 استاد دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه تهران

3 رئیس گروه مدیریت دولتی دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی- تهران مرکز. تهران ایران

4 استاد تمام رشته مدیریت رفتار سازمانی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی. تهران. ایران

چکیده

هدف: پژوهش حاضر با هدف مفهوم‌پردازی از درست‌مایگی برای مهار پدیده فساد اداری انجام شده است. درست‌مایگی مفهومی مناسب برای مهار فساد اداری خواهد بود. چرا که سعی می‌کند با معرفی یک رویکرد و گفتمان سلامت مشخص، موارد نقض درست‌مایگی را شناسایی و در جهت مهار پدیده فساد اداری، گام بردارد. درست‌مایگی خود نیز مدل ذهنی و عملی مناسبی برای توسعه اخلاقی در سازمان را فراهم می‌کند.
طراحی/ روش‌شناسی/ رویکرد: پژوهش حاضر از نوع روش مرور روایتی می‌باشد. در این روش سعی می‌شود منابع پراکنده مطالعه شده و به مفهوم‌پردازی متمرکز و منسجم از یک متغیر یا پدیده پرداخته شود. سعی بر آن است تا منابع مختلف بررسی و مرور شده و از میان آن‌ها، مفاهیم و مطالب مرتبط استخراج شده و تشریح مناسبی از مفهوم مورد بررسی ارائه دهد تا در درک روشن مفهوم به خواننده کمک نماید.
یافته­های پژوهش: یافته‌های پژوهش حاضر نشان داده است که درست‌مایگی برای مهار فساد اداری در ابعاد و مفاهیمی از جمله تمامیت، درستکاری، مسئولیت حرفه‌ای، منزه بودن از فساد، بی‌طرفی و پاسخگویی، عمل بر مبنای فضیلت‌هایی همچون عدالت، شجاعت و میانه‌روی، سلامت و اخلاق و به معنی تأملی آشکار در باب اخلاق، ملاحظات قوانین از جمله شفافیت قوانین و مقررات، عمل اخلاقی یا روحی جامع است که در کنار یکدیگر، زمینه‌ای مناسب برای مهار فساد اداری را فراهم می‌کند. در نهایت درست‌مایگی شجاعت اخلاقی و قهرمانی در شکل‌گیری استانداردهای اخلاقی بیان شده است. به عبارت دیگر، هنگامی که درست‌مایگی در فرد یا افرادی متجلی گردد، شجاعت اخلاقی و قهرمانی منبعث از آن اظهار می‌گردد. درست‌مایگی مفهومی برای مبارزه با فساد است. لذا، درست‌مایگی رویکرد و دیدگاهی جدید به مسأله قدیم فساد ارائه می‌دهد که می‌تواند در خدمت مهار فساد اداری قرار گیرد. فساد و سلامت دو روی یک سکه نیستند و لازم است تا خط‌مشی‌گذاران عمومی علاوه بر تمرکز بر شکست فساد، بر ارتقاء درست‌مایگی نیز متمرکز شوند.
محدودیت­‌ها و پیامدها: محدودیت‌های معنایی و وجود دیدگاه‌های متفاوت به مسأله فساد از یک سو و تعابیر مختلف درست‌مایگی از سوی دیگر محدودیتی بوده است که ضرورت پژوهش حاضر را تقویت نموده است. فساد اداری مصادیق و موارد متعدد و فراوانی را شامل می‌شود که پرداختن به آن را پیچیده و دشوار می‌نماید. در مقابل، درست‌مایگی نیز از مفاهیم دارای مصادیق و معانی و تعابیر متعدد است که می‌تواند درک این پدیده را دشوار نماید. با این وجود، پرداختن به درست‌مایگی دیدگاه و رویکردی جدید را در مهار فساد اداری معرفی می‌کند.
پیامدهای عملی: در صورتی که در کنار مبارزه با فساد به توسعه و ارتقاء درست‌مایگی پرداخته شود، مهار فساد اداری از قوت و اثر بیشتری برخودار خواهد شد و در کنار کنترل فساد اداری، احتمال تعالی اخلاقی و فضیلت‌مندی نیز قابل تصور است. تمرکز بر درست‌مایگی نه تنها احتمال فساد اداری را کاهش می‌دهد بلکه در مهار و کنترل آن نیز نقش دارد. علاوه بر آن، سبب رشد ابعاد اخلاقی می‌گردد که ارزش افزوده و اثری بیشتر از مهار فساد اداری را به همراه دارد.
ابتکار یا ارزش مقاله: معرفی مفهوم درست‌مایگی نه به عنوان روی دوم سکه فساد بلکه به عنوان عرصه و زمینه‌ای که می‌تواند در خدمت مهار فساد اداری، مورد توجه قرار گیرد و مسیرها و روش‌ها و ادبیات مختص خود را دارد، در این پژوهش، ارزش ایجاد نموده است. درست‌مایگی سبب تعالی انسانی و رشد و پیشرفت او در شاخص‌ها و معیارهایی می‌گردد که توسعه اخلاقی و انسانی و معنوی و مانند آن را فراهم می‌کند. درست‌مایگی، به تمام وجوه و بودن فرد توجه می‌کند و سعی می‌نماید با در کنار هم قرار دادن ظرفیت‌های مثبت، تعالی‌خواهی اخلاقی و انسانی را مورد حمایت قرار دهد و با پررنگ کردن گفتمان اخلاق و سلامت، به مقابله و مهار فساد اداری می‌پردازد.
نوع مقاله: مقاله مروری
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Conceptualization of Integrity to curb the phenomenon of administrative corruption

نویسندگان [English]

  • seyed mohamadreza Goldani 1
  • Ali Asghar Pourezzat 2
  • Alireza Amir kabiri 3
  • Ali Rezaian 4

1 PhD student, Public Administration, Human Resources, Faculty of Management, Islamic Azad University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor of Public Administration,, University of Tehran

3 Head of the Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, . Tehran Iran

4 Full Professor of Organizational Behavior Management, Shahid Beheshti University. Tehran. Iran

چکیده [English]

Purpose: The current research was done with the aim of conceptualizing the integrity to curb the phenomenon of administrative corruption. Honesty will be a suitable concept to curb administrative corruption. Because it tries to identify the cases of integrity violations by introducing a specific health approach and discourse and took steps to curb the phenomenon of administrative corruption. Self-righteousness also provides a suitable mental and practical model for moral development in the organization.
Design/ methodology/ approach: The current research is a narrative review method. In this method, scattered sources are studied and focused and coherent conceptualization of a variable or phenomenon is attempted. It is tried to examine and review various sources and from among them, related concepts and materials are extracted and provide a suitable description of the concept under review to help the reader in a clear understanding of the concept.
Research Findings: The findings of the present research have shown that honesty is important for curbing administrative corruption in dimensions and concepts such as integrity, honesty, professional responsibility, being free from corruption, impartiality and accountability, acting on the basis of virtues such as justice, courage and moderation, health and ethics and It means a clear reflection on ethics, considerations of laws, including the transparency of laws and regulations, is a comprehensive moral or spiritual act that together provides a suitable ground for curbing administrative corruption. Finally, the meaning of moral courage and heroism in the formation of moral standards has been correctly expressed. In other words, when righteousness is manifested in a person or persons, moral courage and heroism emanating from it are declared. Fairness is a concept to fight corruption. Therefore, Dore Maigi offers a new approach and perspective to the old problem of corruption, which can serve to curb administrative corruption. Corruption and health are not two sides of the same coin and it is necessary for public policy makers to focus on the proper promotion of Maigi in addition to focusing on defeating corruption.
Limitations & Consequences: Semantic limitations and the existence of different views on the issue of corruption on the one hand and different interpretations of correctness on the other hand have been a limitation that has strengthened the necessity of the current research. Corruption includes numerous examples and cases that make it complicated and difficult to deal with. On the other hand, correctness is one of the concepts with many examples and meanings and interpretations that can make it difficult to understand this phenomenon. Nevertheless, dealing with correctness introduces a new perspective and approach in curbing administrative corruption.
Practical Consequences: If, along with the fight against corruption, the development and promotion of proper management is done, the control of administrative corruption will be more powerful and effective. Focusing on correctness not only reduces the possibility of administrative corruption but also plays a role in curbing and controlling it. In addition, it causes the growth of moral dimensions, which brings added value and a greater effect of curbing administrative corruption.
Innovation or value of the Article: Introducing the correct concept of corruption not as the second side of the corruption coin, but as an area and field that can be considered in the service of curbing administrative corruption, and has its own paths, methods and literature, has created value in this research. Righteousness causes human excellence and his growth and progress in indicators and criteria that provide moral, human and spiritual development and the like. Rightly, Maigi pays attention to all the aspects and being of the person and tries to support moral and human excellence by putting together positive capacities and confronts and curbs administrative corruption by highlighting the discourse of ethics and health.
Paper Type: Review Paper
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Corruption
  • Integrity
  • Integrity violations
  • ethics
  • good governance
  1. Abedi Jafari. H, Hosseini Hashemzadeh. D, Muhaddith. H, Fazeli. M(2016). Theories of corruption and administrative integrity: Tehran: Study and planning center of Tehran city (In Persian)
  2. Adam Graycar. (2020). Handbook on corruption, ethics and integrity in public administration(pp.390-391). published by Edward elgar publishing limited.
  3. Afshar, z (2022). Sociological investigation of the causes of inefficiency of anti-corruption policies and programs in Iran after the revolution. Tehran: center for strategic studies (In Persian)
  4. Afshar, Z. (2022). Sociological investigation of the causes of inefficiency of anti-corruption policies and programs in Iran after the revolution. Tehran: center for strategic studies (In Persian)
  5. Afzali, A. (2012). Official Corruption and Its Effect on Development: Causes and Solutions. International Law Review (Quarterly), 28, (45), 235-264(In Persian)
  6. Alizadeh Sani, M., Fani, A. (2007), The impact of administrative corruption on the human development of societies. Ethics in Science and Technology (Quarterly), 2(1,2),17-24 (In Persian)
  7. Becker, M., & Talsma, J. (2016). Adding colours to the shades of grey: Enriching the integrity discourse with virtue ethics concepts. In A. Lawton, Z. van der Wal, & L. Huberts (Eds.), Ethics in public policy and management: A global research companion (pp. 33–50). London, England: Routledge
  8. Becker, T. E. (1998). Integrity in organizations: Beyond honesty and conscientiousness. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 154–161.
  9. Benner, Hans & De Haan Lna .(2008) . Saint: a Tool to assess the integrity of public sector organization.
  10. Brenkert, G. G. (Ed.). (2004). Corporate integrity & accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  11. Carter, S. L. (1996). Integrity. New York, NY: Harper Perennial
  12. Dadgar, y., Nazari, R. (2009). Investigating the financial corruption index in Iran and selected countries of the world. Political-Economic Journal, 263,264, 120-135(In Persian)
  13. H., Abdali. R., Mahmoudi Khokhsarai, M. (2006). Researches on corruption and int in Iran: domain review, Audit knowledge (Quarterly),79(In Persian)
  14. H(2006). Controlling administrative corruption: reforming public administration or formulating a national strategy to prevent corruption. Management and development, 28,35-53(In Persian)
  15. H, Abdali.R, Mahmoudi Khokhsarai. Researches on corruption and int in Iran: domain review, Audit knowledge (Quarterly),79(In Persian)
  16. De George, R. T. (1993). Competing with integrity in international business. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  17. A(1998). Dictionary: Tehran: University of Tehran (In Persian)
  18. Dobel, J. P. (1999). Public integrity. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
  19. Dobel, J. P. (2016; 1990). Integrity in the public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 354–366. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract2769133
  20. Dunn Craig p. 2009. Integrity Matters. International journal of leadership
  21. Dunn Craig, p. (2009). Integrity Matters. International journal of leadership 5, 2.103-125.
  22. Ebrahimzade, R., Pourghafari.r Afsharnia, f. (2016). Factors Influencing the Incidence of corruption in governmental institutions. Journal of Evaluation Knowledge, 8(27), 91-111 (In Persian)
  23. Farhadinejad, M. (2003). Comparative study of administrative corruption in developed and developing countries. Administrative transformation,7, (45), 41-52(In Persian)
  24. Farrokh Sarasht, B. (2004). Investigating the effective factors in the occurrence of administrative corruption in order to provide a model to reduce its effects in the development process of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Management Knowledge (Quarterly), 66, 65-84(In Persian)
  25. Farrokh Sarasht.B,(2004). Investigating the effective factors in the occurrence of administrative corruption in order to provide a model to reduce its effects in the development process of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Management Knowledge (Quarterly), 66, 65-84(In Persian)
  26. Fijnaut, C., & Huberts, L. W. J. C. (Eds.). (2002). Corruption, integrity and law enforcement. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
  27. Graycar Adam. 2020. Handbook on corruption, ethics and integrity in public administration (chapter 1).
  28. Hassan Dost Farkhani, h., Yazdan Panah, l. (2014). Examining the attitude towards administrative corruption and its relationship with social capital (a case study of students of Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman). Regional Science and Technology Information Center ,80-114(In Persian)
  29. Heywood, P. & Kirby, N. (2020). public integrity: from anti-corruption rhetoric to substantive moral ideal.
  30. Heywood, P. (2018). combating corruption in the twenty-first century. Daedalus (2018) 147 (3), 83–97.
  31. Hosseini, M., Mehdizadeh Ashrafi, A.(2008). Factors affecting administrative corruption. Management magazine (Quarterly), Fourth year, 8, 12-24(In Persian)
  32. Huberts leo. 2020. Integrity and quality in different governance phases. Quality of Governance pp103-130.
  33. Huberts, L. W. J. C. (2014). The integrity of governance. What it is, what we know, what is done, and where to go. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
  34. Huberts, L.W.J.C.2018. Integrity: what it is and why it is Important. public integrity, 20: sup1, S18-S32.  
  35. Huberts,L. W.J. C, Muel Kaptein & Bart de Koning (2022) Integrity Scandals of Politicians: A Political Integrity Index, Public Integrity, 24(3), 329-341  
  36. Imamzadehi, M. (2020). The role of the rule of law in promoting integrity:Tehran: Salehian publisher(In Persian)
  37. International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2019. Fiscal monitor: curbing corruption. www .imf .org/ en/Publications/ FM/ Issues/ 2019/ 03/ 18/ fiscal -monitor -april -2019 (accessed 19 March 2020).  
  38. Kaptein, M., & Wempe, J. (2002). The balanced company. A theory of corporate integrity. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  39. Karimi, A. (2006). Fraud and corruption, raa.gov.bt(In Persian)
  40. Karssing, E. D. (2007). Morele competentie in organisaties [Moral competence in organizations]. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum. (Original work published 2001).
  41. Kerkhoff, T. (2019). Histories of Anticorruption and the Myth of Modernity: A Review of Anticorruption in History: From Antiquity to the Modern Era.public Integrity, 21(4),453-456.
  42. Khazri, M. (2005). Institutional analysis of administrative corruption. Strategic Studies, 8(29),1-14(In Persian)
  43. Kirby Nicolas. 2018. An institution-first conception of public integrity.
  44. Lee, Y. S., & Rosenbloom, D. H. (2005). A reasonable public servant. Constitutional foundations of administrative conduct in the United States. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
  45. Mahmoodi, M. (2005), The role of organizational culture in the prevention of administrative corruption. Resourcefulness, 60, (In Persian)
  46. Mahmoodi, M. (2005). The role of organizational culture in the prevention of administrative corruption. Resourcefulness, 60, (In Persian)
  47. Montefiore, A., & Vines, D. (Eds.). (1999). Integrity in the public and private domains. London, England: Routledge.
  48. Mousavi Dost, M. (2019), Causes and consequences of administrative corruption, Journal of new research approaches in management and accounting, 25(In Persian)
  49. Mousavi Dost.M(2019), Causes and consequences of administrative corruption, Journal of new research approaches in management and accounting, volum25(In Persian)
  50. Palanski, M. E. & Yammarino, F. J. (2007). Integrity and Leadership: Clearing the Conceptual Confusion. European Management Journal. 25(3), 171-184.
  51. Palanski, M. E. & Yammarino, F. J. 2007. “Integrity and Leadership: Clearing the Conceptual Confusion.” European Management Journal. 25(3), 171-184.
  52. Qaami, A.M., Velai, F. (2020). Investigating the effects of administrative corruption on financial health in Iran's banking system, Economic Research (Quarterly). 2 (In Persian)
  53. Qalipur, R., Nickraftar, T. (2007). Administrative corruption and appropriate solutions to fight it, Assembly and research, 13, (53), 33-54(In Persian)
  54. Rafipour, F. (2007). The social cancer of corruption:Tehran: Publishing company(In Persian)
  55. R(2008). The role of the World Bank in the fight against corruption. Journal of administrative transformation. 8, (5), 61-77(In Persian)
  56. Rezaeian, A. (2020). Corruption assessment guide: Tehran (In Persian)
  57. Rohr, J. & Heywood, P. (2013). political science approaches to integrity and corruption.
  58. Rohr, J. A. (1989). Ethics for bureaucrats. An essay on law and values (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker
  59. Rohr, J.( 2017). The Meaning of Corruption: testing the coherence and adequacy of corruption definitions. Pages 220-233 | Published online: 29 Nov 2017.  
  60. Rosenbloom, D. H. (2011). Public administration’s legal dimensions: Three models. In D. M. Menzel & H. L. White (Eds.), The state of public administration. Issues, challenges and opportunities (pp. 368–387). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
  61. M., Sameti, M., Shahnazi, R. (2006). Investigating the effect of economic freedom on financial corruption: a case study with the PANEL DATA approach. Economic researches of Iran. 8(28),1-12(In Persian)
  62. Shafiikhorshidi, A. (2006). Economic corruption and its prevention methods: Tehran: Judicial Studies and Development Center (In Persian)
  63. Steden Ronald, V. (2020). Blind Spots in Public Ethics and Integrity Research: What Public Administration Scholars Can Learn from Aristotle.
  64. Thomas, R. M. (2001). Public trust, integrity and privatization. Public Integrity, 3(3), 242–261.
  65. Thompson, D. F. (1995). Ethics in Congress. From individual to institutional corruption. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
  66. Tongeren, P. V., & Becker, M. (2009). Integriteit als deugd.[Integrity as virtue]. In E. Karssing & M. Zweegers (Eds.), Jaarboek Integriteit 2010 (pp. 58–65). Den Haag, the Netherlands: BIOS.
  67. Uhr, J. (1999). Institutions of integrity: Balancing values and verification in democratic government. Public Integrity, 1(1), 94–106.
  68. Vian Taryn. (2020). Anti-corruption, transparency and accountability in health: concepts, frameworks, and approaches. Global Health Action, l. 13.
  69. Zahari Afzal, I., Jamaliah, S., Roshayani, A. (2019). Integrity climate questionnaire.Cogent Psychology,6:1, 1626541.
  70. Zarandi, S., Madani, M. (2016). Comparative study of administrative corruption in selected countries (Asia and Pacific): Tehran: Azarin Mehr publisher (In Persian)
  71. Zarandi, S.,Madani, M. (2015).Designing a local model to fight against administrative corruption in Iran. Journal of Evaluation Knowledge (Quarterly). Issue24(In Persian)
  72. Zhargami Fard, M., Danaieefard, H. (2016). Understanding the phenomenon of managers' honesty and identifying the factors that shape it. Management in The Islamic University. 12, 294-312 (In Persian)
چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی
دوره 15، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 59
1403
صفحه 15-33