Validation of Employee Safety and Health Model with Human Capital Management Approach in the Country's Oil Industry

Document Type : Research Article (with quantitative approaches)

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management, Dana Non-profit Higher Education Institute, Yasouj, Iran

2 Ph.D, Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Purpose: In recent decades, employee safety and health have been considered by organizations as fundamental human capital rights, requiring them to comply with what is needed in the field of human resource management systems. Accordingly, the organization must have sufficient data and information regarding the importance of factors that affect the safety and health of its human capital. Maintaining human capital plays a fundamental role in the growth and excellence of an organization. From this perspective, the primary goal of the present study is to validate the paradigmatic model of employee safety and health, incorporating a human capital management approach, in the country's oil industry.
Design/methodology/approach: The employee safety and health model, previously developed in the qualitative part of this study, is now being validated in this part of the study. In this respect, the present study is the positivist part of this applied pragmatic research. The method of collecting research data was descriptive-survey and correlational. The statistical population of the study comprised all managers and employees from the southern oil-rich regions, and the sample size was determined using the Morgan table and a multi-stage sampling method, resulting in a sample of 384 individuals. A researcher-made questionnaire was also used to validate the paradigmatic model in the quantitative section. The questionnaire consisted of six dimensions and 51 items in the form of a Likert scale. Research data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26 software and a structural equation modeling approach, employing the partial least squares method through SmartPLS version 4 software. After that, the reliability coefficient of the questionnaire was estimated using face validity, convergent validity, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The construct validity of the questionnaire was also examined through confirmatory factor analysis, and finally, the reliability and validity of the research were confirmed. In the final step, the fit of the employee safety and health model was examined using the P-value and T-value significance coefficient tests, R-squared index, Q-squared index, SRMR index, NFI index, and regression coefficient. The results obtained showed the fit of the studied model.
Research Findings: The results confirm a positive and direct relationship between the dimensions of the paradigm model of employee safety and health and the human capital management approach in the oil-rich regions of the south. Therefore, all five proposed research hypotheses have been accepted. It is worth noting that the highest level of influence was related to the effect of the causal conditions of the model (work safety; occupational health; educational factors and employee awareness) on the central phenomenon of the model (human resource maintenance system; safety and health of the organization's environment) and was 0.78. Other path coefficients have also been accepted, and their positive impact has been confirmed.
Limitations & Consequences: The most important limitation of this research was the time-consuming and difficult access to the statistical population. Also, the use of questionnaire tools for validation and the inaccuracy of respondents to the questions are considered to be among its important limitations because the extraction of data for the final model was based on the data available in the field under study.
Practical Consequences: Given the applicability of the present study, its results have provided various scientific implications for improving employee safety and health. Among these implications are the following:
- Identifying the impact of variables on the causal conditions of employee safety and health, and assisting in compiling the documents required by the organization to prevent potential risks and harm.
- Assisting the organization in regulating important provisions on employee safety and health to familiarize the workforce and improve their access to the required basics.
- Introducing effective strategies in order of priority for use by managers and employees to improve the situation and desired outcomes in the field of employee safety and health.
Therefore, by making the prioritization of the variables in the model available, desirable results can be achieved regarding employee safety and health.
Innovation or value of the Article: Validating the paradigmatic model of employee safety and health based on the Strauss and Corbin approach was the main initiative of this article. In studies in this field, this method has not been previously used, and measurements and evaluations have been based on existing guidelines and ISO standards. However, in the present study, validation was conducted based on local data, and, in this respect, it can be generalized to other industries and organizations. Thus, the existence of this quantified model will add to the value ​​of the organization's safety and health department and help industry and organizational managers understand the importance of employee safety and health.
Paper Type: Original Paper
 

Keywords

  1. Abuhamra, L. A., & Enshassi, A. A. (2015). Strategies for safety and productivity improvement. 2(1), 65–74.
  2. Angrist, N., Djankov, S., Goldberg, P., & Patrinos, H. A. (2019). Measuring Human Capital. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3339416
  3. Aven, T. (2014). What is safety science ? Safety Science, 67(0925), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.026
  4. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  5. Castillo, F., Mora, A. M., Kayser, G. L., Vanos, J., Hyland, C., Yang, A. R., & Eskenazi, B. (2020). Environmental Health Threats to Latino Migrant Farmworkers. Annual Review of Public Health, 42, 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-012420-105014
  6. Cuenca-Lozano, M. F., & Ramírez-García, C. O. (2023). Occupational Hazards in Firefighting: Systematic Literature Review. Safety and Health at Work, 14(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2023.01.005
  7. DeMarco, T., & Lister, T. (1998). Human capital. In IEEE Software (Vol. 15, Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.1109/52.730859
  8. Dhillon, G., Syed, R., & Pedron, C. (2016). Interpreting information security culture: An organizational transformation case study. Computers and Security, 56, 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.10.001
  9. Esterhuyzen, E. (2022). Occupational health and safety in small businesses: The rationale behind compliance. African Journal of Business Ethics, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.15249/16-1-287
  10. Falah, B., Tavakoli Afjadi, A., & Shokrollahi, M. (2024). The role of safety, health and environment in the oil, gas and petrochemical industry. The 9th International Conference on Oil, Gas, Petrochemicals and HSE. (in Persian)
  11. Gholami Cenarestan, A., Jokar Morderaz, S., & Daneshfard, K. (2024). Designing the Safety and Health Model of Employees with the Approach of Human Capital Management in the Country's Oil Industry. Public Administration Perspective, 15(2), 111-140. https://DOI: 10.48308/JPAP.2024.232269.1317. (in Persian)
  12. Goldin, C. (2016). Human Capital Human Capital. In Social economics (Issue I). https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-349-19806-1_19
  13. Henseler, J. (2018). Partial least squares path modeling: Quo vadis? Quality and Quantity, 52(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0689-6
  14. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20(2009), 277–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
  15. Hossain, U., & Roy, I. (2016). Human capital management: the new competitive approach. Human Capital Management, January, 1020–1034.
  16. Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::aid-smj13>3.0.co;2-7
  17. Katunge, G., English, J., Teacher, L., Girls, M., School, H., Wahu, R., & Dean, M. (2016). Maintaining Health and Safety at Workplace: Employee and Employer’s Role in Ensuring a Safe Working Environment. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(29), 1–7. www.iiste.org
  18. Kucharčíková, A., Tokarčíková, E., & Blašková, M. (2015). Human Capital Management – Aspect of the Human Capital Efficiency in University Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.332
  19. Małysa, T. (2022). Application of Forecasting as an Element of Effective Management in the Field of Improving Occupational Health and Safety in the Steel Industry in Poland. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031351
  20. Melnikovas, A. (2018). Towards an explicit research methodology: Adapting research onion model for futures studies. Journal of Futures Studies, 23(2), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.201812_23(2).0003
  21. Moore, T. A. B. and M. T. (2014). Hoyle CFA Chapter. Confirmatory Factor Analysis, July 2012, 1–38.
  22. Moyce, S. C., & Schenker, M. (2018). Migrant Workers and Their Occupational Health and Safety. Annual Review of Public Health, 39, 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013714
  23. Occupational Health and Safety Management System Standard ISO 45001 (2018), (Translated by Ghafouri Afshari, G; Azimi Lisar, GH). Tehran: Fadak Isatis Publishing House.  2-190. ISBN 978-600-160-318-1. (in Persian)
  24. Outline, C. (2017). Health Status Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801504-9.00006-4
  25. Park, S., Johnson, M. D., & Hong, O. S. (2020). Analysis of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) noise standard violations over 50 years: 1972 to 2019. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 63(7), 616–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23116
  26. Pouliakas, K., Theodossiou, I., Nkolimwa, D., Moyce, S. C., Schenker, M., & Małysa, T. (2013). Migrant Workers and Their Occupational Health and Safety. Annual Review of Public Health, 14(3), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031351
  27. Putri, K. D., & Nora Anisa Br. Sinulingga. (2020). The Effect of Training and the Implementation of Occupational Health and Safety Systems on Employee Productivity of PT. PP. London Sumatra Indonesia Tbk Branch Office Medan. Journal of Economics and Business (JECOMBI), 2(1), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.58471/jecombi.v2i1.9
  28. Romero-Carazas, R., Mora-Barajas, J. G., Villanueva-Batallanos, M., Bernedo-Moreira, D. H., Romero, I. A., Ruiz Rodríguez, M. J., Román-Mireles, A., Espinoza-Casco, R. J., Pérez-Mamani, R. H., & Santos-Maldonado, A. B. (2022). Information management in the area of occupational health and safety for the prevention of occupational accidents in companies. Data and Metadata, 1. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm202270
  29. Seyed Javadin, R. (2013 Fundamentals of Human Resource Management. Tehran University Press. 393-394. ISBN 978-964-6020-18-4. (in Persian)
  30. Shikdar, A. A., & Sawaqed, M. N. (2003). Worker productivity, and occupational health and safety
  31. issues in selected industries. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 45 (2003) 563–572. https:// DOI: 1016/S0360-8352(03)00074-3
  32. Son, H. H. (2010). Human capital development. ADB Economics Working Paper Series, 225, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.1120-11342r1
  33. Suárez-Albanchez, J., Blazquez-Resino, J. J., Gutierrez-Broncano, S., & Jimenez-Estevez, P. (2021). Occupational health and safety, organisational commitment, and turnover intention in the Spanish IT consultancy sector. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115658
  34. Tabibi, J.; Maleki, M.; & Delgoshai, B. (2012). Compilation of Theses, Dissertations, Research Plans and Scientific Articles. Tehran: Ferdos. 132-133. ISBN 978-964-320-416-7. (in Persian)
  35. Xu, K., Wu, C., Xu, Q., Yao, X., Li, L., Xu, X., Sun, E., Li, J., & Li, X. (2019). What is the object of safety science ? 118(3), 907–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.029
  36. Yılmaz, F. (2021). Evaluatıon of Workıng Condıtıons and Professıonal Independence Perceptıons of Occupatıonal Health and Safety Professıonals. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 15(4), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/142215