Public Administration Perspective

Identification and Prioritization of Organizational Units for the Pilot Implementation of the Knowledge Management System in Government Organizations (Case study: Cultural Resources Fund)

Document Type : Research Article (with quantitative approaches)

Authors

Shahid Beheshti Universtity

Abstract

Today, knowledge management and related mechanisms are considered as a major challenge for organizations, because in the absence of knowledge management, organizations can not benefit from multiple benefits and, on the other hand, establishing such systems always has its own problems; therefore, the choice of pilot knowledge management for the best management of this project is very necessary. The main purpose of the present research is to provide a method for prioritizing organizational units in order to implement knowledge management in governmental organizations. The present research is a descriptive survey method in terms of the purpose of the research. The statistical population of this research is 10 experts in the field of knowledge management in the Cultural Resources Fund. They were selected on the basis of a targeted sampling approach. In this research, the researcher, with the study of theoretical literature and the history of internal and external research, identified 10 factors in the establishment of knowledge management in the Cultural Resources Fund, which includes 10 criteria including culture, information technology, management, organizational structure, strategy, education, human resources, The view was about changes, knowledge processes and motivational rewards. In this research, two questionnaires were used to collect data. This questionnaire was distributed among the members of the Cultural Resources Fund who had sufficient knowledge in knowledge management and pilot implementation. Fuzzy Dematel and Fuzzy Delphi were used to analyze the data. The criteria that have a higher weight are management (6,646), human resources (6,289), knowledge processes (6,185), strategy (6,109), and organizational culture (6,106) are most important among research criteria.

Keywords

  1. منابع فارسی
  2. اخوان، پیمان؛ سنجقی، محمدابراهیم و اجاقی، حامد.(1391). بررسی روابط بین مدیریت نوآور، فرهنگ سازمانی و مدیریت دانش (مطالعه موردی در سازمان های صنعتی پژوهشی منتخب). راهبرد دفاعی، 10(38)، صص175-199.
  3. بهادری، فرد، عبدالرضا(1391) « رویکردی بر مدیریت دانش، راه‌کارها و موانع پیش‌رو» نشریه تدبیر، ش 108 ، ص 1-8
  4. نظافتی، نوید، سجادی، بهروز، علی بیگی، بهنام( 1391) « تأثیر استراتژی­های مدیریت دانش بر نوآوری و عملکرد سازمان جهاد کشاورزی استان.تهران» فصلنامه چشم‌انداز مدیریت دولتی- تهران، دوره 6، ش2ش، ص 1- 8
  5. منابع انگلیسی
  6. Alavi, M. and Leidner, D., (2001) Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(6), 95-116.
  7. Bailey , N (2010) " Edington Assessing value in organizational knowledge creation: Considerations for knowledge workers
  8. Bertoni G.D. (2008)Knowledge management in organizations: Examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people
  9. Che Pa, M.P.. (2012) Improving learning management through semantic web and social networks in e-learning environments,Expert system with applications 38 pp 1-19
  10. Davenport, T. H., De Long, D. W., & Beers, M. C. (1998). Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan management review, 39(2), 57-43
  11. Fontela, E., & Gabus, A. (1976). The DEMATEL observer, DEMATEL 1976 Switzerland Geneva: Battelle Geneva Research Center.
  12. Hung, C.Y. Ming Hung, S.Pin Lin, Q. Tsai, M. L. (2005). Critical Factors in Adopting a Knowledge Management System For The Pharmaceutical Industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(2), 164-183
  13. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5 (1) (2008), pp. 68-75
  14. Kebede, B ( 2010)" Knowledge management: a multi-disciplinary approach to knowledge in organisations. In: Proceedings IAKE 1992, p. 30-53. Software Engineering Press, Kensington
  15. Knoco Ltd, (2011) KM White Paper – pilot projects , available at:http://www.knoco.com/KM%20White%20Paper%20%.
  16. Lin, C J; Wu, W W.(2008). A causal analytical method for group decision making under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 205-213.
  17. M. Kang, B. Kim (2014) Embedded resources and knowledge transfer among R&D employees Journal of Knowledge Management, 17 (5) (2014), pp. 709-723
  18. Milton,Nick and Barnes,Stephanie (2015). Designing a Successful KM Strategy: A Guide for the Knowledge Management Professional. United States of America.
  19. MIS Quarterly, 29 (2) (2010), pp. 279-309
  20. Ritella, H., Geib, M., Kolbe, L.M. and Brenner, W. (2015) Knowledge-enabled customer relationship management. Journal of Knowledge Management 7(5), 10406–10421.
  21. Shan , S. Zhao Q, Hua , F (2013) " Impact of quality management practices on the knowledge creation process" Computers & Industrial Engineering 64 (2013) 211–223
  22. Shankar, Venkatesh, Amy K. Smith, and Arvind Rangaswamy (2003), “Customer satisfaction and loyalty in online and offline environments,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20(2), 153-75.
  23. Wu H Y, Sin Y H, (2010) Using BPNN and DEMATEL to modify importance–performance analysis model – A study of the computer industry. Exper Systems with Applications 2009; 36: 9969–9979.
  24. Zenip Orden , Su-Chao Chang and Ming-Shing Lee. (2014). The linkage between knowledge accumulation capability and organizational innovation, JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, VOL. 12 NO. 1 2008, pp. 29-49
Public Administration Perspective
Volume 9, Issue 1 - Serial Number 1
March 2018
Pages 65-86