چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی

بررسی تأثیر سبک رهبری شوخ طبعانه بر تاب‌آوری کارکنان با نقش میانجی خودکارآمدی خلاق و خودکارآمدی همزیستی با شغل

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی ( با رویکردهای کمی)

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران.

2 استاد گروه آموزشی مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اداری، دانشگاه سمنان، ایران.

3 استادیار، دانشکده اقتصاد و مدیریت دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران.

چکیده

هدف: در دنیای امروز سازمان­ها با چالش­های متعددی از جمله فشارهای کاری، تغییرات سریع و نیاز به نوآوری مواجهند. در این راستا تاب‌آوری کارکنان به عنوان یک ویژگی کلیدی برای مقابله با چالش­ها و حفظ عملکرد موثر در محیط کار اهمیت فراوانی دارد. رهبری شوخ‌طبعانه به معنی استفاده از شوخی در فرآیند رهبری است. این سبک می­تواند به ایجاد یک محیط کار مثبت و حمایت کننده کمک نماید. لذا پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی تاثیر سبک رهبری شوخ‌طبعانه بر تاب‌آوری کارکنان با نقش واسطه‌ای خودکارآمدی خلاق و خودکارآمدی همزیستی با شغل انجام شده است.
طراحی/ روش‌شناسی/ رویکرد: پژوهش از حیث هدف، کاربردی و از نظر روش، توصیفی از نوع همبستگی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر شامل کارکنان رسمی شرکت گاز استان سمنان به تعداد 115 نفر است. با توجه به جامعه آماری 115 نفری با بهره‌گیری از جدول کرجسی مورگان تعداد 112 نفر به عنوان نمونه به شیوه نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب گردید. برای جمع‌آوری اطلاعات از پرسشنامه استاندارد مبتنی بر طیف لیکرت استفاده شد. جهت تجزیه ‌و تحلیل داده‌های جمع‌آوری شده از مدل معادلات ساختاری استفاده شده است که شامل تحلیل عاملی تأییدی، مدل‌های ساختاری تجزیه‌ و تحلیل مسیر و رگرسیون چندگانه است. همچنین برای انجام تحلیل‌های آماری از دو نرم‌افزار SPSS و PLS استفاده‌ شده است.
یافته­‌های پژوهش: نتایج پژوهش نشان‌دهنده این بود که خودکارآمدی خلاق نقش میانجی در رابطه بین سبک رهبری شوخ‌طبعانه و تاب‌آوری کارکنان دارد. خودکارآمدی هم‌زیستی با شغل نقش میانجی در رابطه بین سبک رهبری شوخ‌طبعانه و تاب‌آوری کارکنان دارد. همچنین سبک رهبری شوخ‌طبعانه و تاب‌آوری کارکنان، خودکارآمدی خلاق و خودکارآمدی همزیستی با شغل تأثیر معناداری دارد و در نهایت، خودکارآمدی خلاق و خودکارآمدی همزیستی با شغل بر تاب‌آوری کارکنان تأثیر معناداری دارد.
محدودیت­‌ها و پیامدها: در پژوهش حاضر داده‌ها در یک نقطه زمانی مقطعی جمع آوری شده است. مهمترین محدودیت پژوهش حاضر این بود که دسترسی به جامعه آماری تحقیق بسیار سخت و زمانبر بود. پرسشنامه توزیع شده با پیگیری‌های متوالی جمع آوری می‌شد که طبعاً برنامه‌ریزی‌های صورت گرفته را به تعویق انداخت. محدودیتی که در این پژوهش حاکم بود، مربوط به متغیر سبک رهبری شوخ‌طبعانه و سایر متغیرها می‌باشد. شوخ‌طبعی، تاب‌آوری، خودکارآمدی خلاق و خودکارآمدی همزیستی با شغل قابل سنجش نبوده و صرفا نگرش و ادراک مدیران می‌باشد.
پیامدهای عملی: تاثیر سبک رهبری شوخ‌طبعانه بر تاب‌آوری کارکنان می‌تواند به طور مستقیم و غیرمستقیم از طریق میانجی‌گری خودکارآمدی خلاق و خودکارآمدی همزیستی با شغل تحلیل شود. پیامدهای عملی این موضوع شامل افزایش تاب‌آوری کارکنان، تقویت خودکارآمدی خلاق، ارتقاء خودکارآمدی همزیستی با شغل، بهبود عملکرد سازمانی و توسعه فرهنگ سازمانی مثبت می‌باشد همچنین رهبری شوخ‌طبعانه می‌تواند به عنوان یک ابزار موثر برای تقویت تاب‌آوری کارکنان عمل کند.
ابتکار یا ارزش مقاله: به نظر می‌رسد تاکنون پژوهشی به بررسی تاثیر سبک رهبری شوخ‌طبعانه بر تاب‌آوری کارکنان به‌طور هم‌زمان بر دو متغیر خوکارآمدی خلاق و خودکارآمدی همزیستی با شغل نپرداخته است. همچنین انجام این پژوهش کمک به شناسایی عوامل موثر بر تاب‌آوری، ایجاد فضایی مثبت در سازمان، تقویت مهارت‌های حل مسئله و بهبود تعاملات اجتماعی می‌کند.
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Effect of Humorous Leadership Style on Employee Resilience with the Mediating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy and Job-Coexistence Self-Efficacy

نویسندگان [English]

  • Maedeh Aghvami Panah 1
  • Abbas Ali Rastgar 2
  • Hooshmand Bagheri Garbollagh 3

1 MSc. Student., Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.

2 Professor, Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Economics and Management, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Purpose: In today's world, organizations face many challenges, including work pressures, rapid changes, and the need for innovation. In this regard, employee resilience is important as a key feature of dealing with challenges and maintaining effective performance in the workplace. Particular leadership means using a joke in the leadership process. This style can help create a positive and supportive work environment. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the impact of the humor leadership style on employee resilience with the intermediary role of creative self-efficacy and the self-efficacy of coexistence with the job.
Design/ methodology/ approach: In terms of purpose, the research is applied and in terms of method, it is descriptive of the correlation type. The statistical population of the present study includes 115 official employees of Semnan Gas Company. According to the statistical population of 115 people, 112 people were selected as a sample by simple random sampling using Morgan's Kargesi table. A standard questionnaire based on the Likert scale was used to collect information. The structural equation model was used to analyze the collected data, which includes confirmatory factor analysis, structural models, path analysis, and multiple regression. SPSS and PLS software were also used to perform statistical analysis.
 Research Findings: The research results showed that creative self-efficacy plays a mediating role in the relationship between humorous leadership style and employee resilience. Job coexistence self-efficacy has a mediating role in the relationship between humorous leadership style and employee resilience. Also, humorous leadership style and employee resilience, creative self-efficacy, and job coexistence self-efficacy have a significant effect, and finally, creative self-efficacy and job coexistence self-efficacy have a significant impact on employee resilience.
 Limitations & Consequences: In this research, data was collected at a cross-sectional time point. The most important limitation of the current research was that it was very difficult and time-consuming to access the statistical population of the research. The distributed questionnaire was collected with successive follow-ups, delaying the plans. The limitation that prevailed in this research is related to the humorous leadership style variable and other variables. Humor, resilience, creative self-efficacy, and self-efficacy of coexistence with job cannot be measured, and it is only the attitude and perception of managers.
 Practical Consequences: The impact of humorous leadership style on employees' resilience can be analyzed directly and indirectly through the mediation of creative self-efficacy and job symbiosis self-efficacy. The practical consequences of this issue include: increasing employee resilience, strengthening creative self-efficacy, promoting self-efficacy in coexistence with work, improving organizational performance, and developing a positive organizational culture. Also, humorous leadership can serve as an effective tool to strengthen employee resilience.
Innovation or value of the Article: So far, no research has investigated the impact of humorous leadership style on the resilience of employees simultaneously on the two variables of creative self-efficacy and self-efficacy of coexistence with work. Also, conducting this research helps to identify factors affecting resilience, creating a positive atmosphere in the organization, strengthening problem-solving skills, and improving social interactions.
 
Paper Type: Original Paper
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Creative Self-Efficacy
  • Coexistence Self-Efficacy with Work
  • Employee Resilience
  • Humorous Leadership Style
  1. Adams, R. N., Mosher, C. E., Cohee, A. A., Stump, T. E., Monahan, P. O., Sledge, G. W., Cella, D. & Champion, V. L. (2017). Avoidant coping and self-efficacy mediate relationships between perceived social constraints and symptoms among long-term breast cancer survivors: Social constraints and cancer symptoms. Psycho-Oncology, 26, 982–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4119
  2. Akradalo, Mohammad, Hosseini Shakib, Mehrdad; Khamsa, Abbas. (1400). Examining the influence of leadership styles on the atmosphere of innovation and creativity of employees with the moderating role of creative self-efficacy and the mediating role of trust and individual identity (case study: Tax Administration). Sustainable Human Resource Management, 3(4), 7-38. (in persin)
  3. Andersson T, Cäker M, Tengblad S, Wickelgren M.Building traits for organizational resilience through balancing organizational structures. Scandinavian Journal of Management. 2019; 35(1): 36-45.
  4. Arbabi Isfahani, Mohammad, Arbabi Isfahani, Maryam. (1402). Towards a dynamic model of organizational resilience. Governance and Development, 3(1), 71-98. (in persin)
  5. Askarpourkabir, Abdulhamid; Nikpour, Amin; Glory, Zahra; Salari, Yasser (1401). Humorous leadership style and organizational effectiveness: Clarifying the mediating role of employees' job satisfaction, Journal of Human Resource Management Development and Support, 66 (Winter 1401), 55-88. (in persin)
  6. Barasa, E., Mbau, R., & Gilson, L. (2018). What is resilience and how can it be nurtured? A systematic review of empirical literature on organizational resilience. International journal of health policy and management, 7(6), 491.‏
  7. Bergrizan, Mehtab, 2017, the influence of leadership style on the resilience of employees of creative industries, the 4th international conference on management, psychology and humanities with a sustainable development approach, Shiraz. (in persin)
  8. Berkovich I and Benoliel P (2020) Framing the role of the school leader in OECD documents: A critical analysis. Globalisation. Societies and Education 19(1): 41–54.
  9. Burnard, K., Bhamra, R., & Tsinopoulos, C. (2018). Building organisational resilience: four configurations. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 1-42.
  10. Catalan C, Robert B,(2010). Evaluation of organizational resilence: Application in Quebec. Proceedings of Fourth Resilience Engineering Symposium.
  11. Cheng, D., Chan, X. W., Amarnani, R. K., & Farivar, F. (2021). Finding humor in work–life conflict: Distinguishing the effects of individual and co-worker humor. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 125, 103538.‏
  12. Choi, J. N. (2004). Individual and contextual predictors of creative performance: the mediating role of psychological processes, Creativity Research Journal, 16 (2_3), 187_199.
  13. Decker W and Rotondo D (2001) Relationships among gender, type of humour, and perceived leader effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Issues 13(4): 450–465.
  14. DeCou, C. R., Mahoney, C. T., Kaplan, S. P., & Lynch, S. M. (2019). Coping self-efficacy and trauma-related shame mediate the association between negative social reactions to sexual assault and PTSD symptoms. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 11(1), 51.‏
  15. Edgar B and Pryor B (2003) Cognitive processing, creativity, apprehension, and the humorous personality. North American Journal of Psychology 5(1): 31–46.
  16. Eshtiaghi, Mohsen, Fayazi, Marjan, Nargesian, Abbas; Fuladi, Alireza. (1402). Presenting a humorous leadership model in production organizations (case study: Iran's thermal electricity production industry, power plants affiliated to the Ministry of Energy). Organizational Behavior Studies, 12(1), 131-164(in persin)
  17. Evans, T. R., & Steptoe-Warren, G. (2018). Humor style clusters: Exploring managerial humor. International Journal of Business Communication, 55(4), 443-454.
  18. Faryabi, Mohammad, Rahimi Aghdam, Samad, Sorehi, Mohammadreza, and Pouraqabalai, Alireza. (2018). The effect of market orientation and international experience on export performance with the mediating role of international marketing strategy. International Business Management, 2(1 (seq. 4)), 23-44. (in persin)
  19. Ferris, G. (2021). Undermining resilience: How the modern UK university manufactures heightened vulnerability in legal academics and what is to be done. Law Teacher, 55(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.1872865
  20. Fleming, L. (2020). An analysis of the public reporting of organisational resilience found within the integrated reports of a large state-owned enterprise. (Thesis). Rhodes University.
  21. Fleming, L. (2020). An analysis of the public reporting of organisational resilience found within the integrated reports of a large state-owned enterprise. (Thesis). Rhodes University.
  22. Florez-Jimenez, M. P., Lleo, A., Ruiz-Palomino, P., & Muñoz-Villamizar, A. F. (2024). Corporate sustainability, organizational resilience, and corporate purpose: a review of the academic traditions connecting them. Review of Managerial Science, 1-38.‏
  23. Folke, C. (2016). Resilience (republished). Ecology and society, 21(4).‏
  24. Fotinatos-Ventouratos, R. S. J., & Clements, A. (2022). From poverty to flourishing: Covid perspective. British Psychological Society, BPS Briefing Paper, March 2022.
  25. Hamann, K. R., Wullenkord, M. C., Reese, G., & van Zomeren, M. (2024). Believing that we can change our world for the better: A Triple-A (Agent-Action-Aim) Framework of self-efficacy beliefs in the context of collective social and ecological aims. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 28(1), 11-53.‏
  26. Hamel, G. and Valikangas, L., (2003). The Quest for Resilience. [online] Harvard Business Review, 81,              52–63.
  27. Hayati, Masoumeh, Shahni Yilagh, Manijeh; Keikhosravani, born (1402). The effect of textual schema therapy on interpersonal sensitivity and coping self-efficacy of adolescent girls with social anxiety. Quarterly Journal of Applied Psychological Research, 14(1), 99-114. (in persin)
  28. Hirsch, L. (2022). The Role of Coping Self-Efficacy, Coping Strategies, and Resiliency Following Sexual Assault. (Thesis). Seattle Pacific University.
  29. Hirsch, L. (2022). The Role of Coping Self-Efficacy, Coping Strategies, and Resiliency Following Sexual Assault. (Thesis). Seattle Pacific University.
  30. Hollnagel, E. (2010). How resilient is your organisation? An introduction to the resilience analysis grid (RAG). In Sustainable transformation: Building a resilient organization.‏
  31. Hosseini, Abolhasan. Jafari Baziar, Fatima. (2018). Organizational resilience from the perspective of talented employees and organization managers. Improvement and transformation management studies, 28(91), 9-30. (in persin)
  32. Hua, J. N. (2019). Coping Self-Efficacy Influences Health Information Avoidance. (Thesis). University of California.
  33. Ishak, A. W., & Williams, E. A. (2018). A dynamic model of organizational resilience: Adaptive and anchored approaches. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 23(2), 180-196.
  34. Kantur, D., & Say, A. I. (2015). Measuring Organizational Resilience: A Scale Development. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 4(3), 456-472.
  35. Kong, D. T., Cooper, C. D., & Sosik, J. J. (2019). The state of research on leader humor. Organizational psychology review, 9(1), 3-40.
  36. Kong, D. T., Cooper, C. D., & Sosik, J. J. (2019). The state of research on leader humor. Organizational psychology review, 9(1), 3-40.
  37. Liu, F., Chow, I. H.-S., Gong, Y., & Huang, M. (2019). Affiliative and aggressive humor in leadership and their effects on employee voice: a serial mediation model. 1-19.
  38. Luberto, C. M., Cotton, S., McLeish, A. C., Mingione, C. J., & O'Bryan, E. M. (2014). Mindfulness skills and emotion regulation: The mediating role of coping self-efficacy. Mindfulness, 5(4), 373- 380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0190-6
  39. Mahmoudzadeh, Ebrahim, Kashtkar Hranki, Mehran, Noori, Jalal, and Momiwand, Hojat Elah. (1401). Investigating the relationship between knowledge management and organizational resilience (a case study of a research organization). Industrial Technology Development, 20(47), 17-28. (in persin)
  40. Mathisen, G. E., & Bronnick, K. S. (2009). Creative self-efficacy: An intervention study. International Journal of Educational Research, 48(1), 21-29.
  41. Michalik U and Sznicer I (2017) The use of humor in the multicultural working environment. In: Gabryś -Barker D, Gałajda D, Wojtaszek A, Zakrajewski P (eds.) Multiculturalism, Multilingualism and the Self. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham.
  42. Nikkhah, Maryam and Heydari, Marzieh. (1401). The structural model of transformational leadership with employee creativity and organizational innovation with regard to the mediating role of creative self-efficacy. Educational Management Innovations, 18(2), 16-34. (in persin)
  43. Puente-Díaz, R., & Cavazos-Arroyo, J. (2017). The influence of creative mindsets on achievement goals, enjoyment, creative self-efficacy and performance among business students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 1-11.‏
  44. Reff, R. C. (2006). Developing the humor styles questionnaire-revised: a review of the current humor literature and a revised measure.
  45. Ruiz-Martin, C., López-Paredes, A., & Wainer, G. (2018). What we know and do not know about organizational resilience. International journal of production management and engineering, 6(1), 11-28.
  46. Sadat Khashoui, Mahdieh, Pareghi, Hamidreza, Aghaei, Asghar, (2018), construction and validation of the humor questionnaire, SHQ, Psychological Research, Volume 12, Number 1 and 2. (in persin)
  47. Sawalha, I. H. S. (2015). Managing Adversity: Understanding Some Dimensions of Organizational Resilience. Management Research Review, 38(4), 1-15.
  48. Sedaghat, Atiyeh, Danaifard, Hassan, Kazemi, Seyed Hossein; Khaef Elahi, Ahmad Ali. (1400). Analyzing the strategies of Iran's government organizations to create resilience in employees during the covid 19 epidemic: a qualitative research. Iranian Public Administration Studies, 4(3), 1-30. (in persin)
  49. Selajgeh, Ali, Bigleri, Nasreen; Andam, Reza. (1400). Clarifying the mediating role of positive organizational behavior in the relationship between managers' humor and creativity of employees of sports and youth departments in Kerman province. Sports Management Studies, 13(70), 362-393. (in persin)
  50. Shaw, A., Kapnek, M., & Morelli, N. A. (2021). Measuring creative self-efficacy: An item response theory analysis of the creative self-efficacy scale. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 678033.‏
  51. shin, j., taylor, s., & seo, m.-g. (2012). resources for change : the relationships of organizational inducements and psychological resilience to employees’ attitudes and behaviors toward organizational change author (s): jiseon shin, m. susan taylor and myeong-gu seo source : the academy of. the academy of management journal, 55(3), 727–748.
  52. Tremblay, M. (2017) Humor in Teams: Multilevel Relationships between Humor Climate, Inclusion, Trust, and Citizenship Behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32, 363-378.
  53. Vogus, T. J., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Organizational resilience: Towards a theory and research agenda. In 2007 IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics (pp. 3418-3422). IEEE.‏
  54. Xiao, L., & Cao, H. (2017). Organizational resilience: The theoretical model and research implication. In ITM Web of Conferences (Vol. 12, p. 04021). EDP Sciences.‏
  55. Xu, J. (2020). The review of humorous leader. Open Journal of Business and Management, 8(2), 542-551.
چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی
دوره 15، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 60
1403
صفحه 112-134