چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی

نقش سرمایه اجتماعی سازمانی در انسجام سازمانی با میانجی‌گری هم‌آفرینی در بین اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه بیرجند، خراسان جنوبی، بیرجند، ایران

2 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت آموزشی. دانشگاه بیرجند. بیرجند. ایران

چکیده

هدف: پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی رابطه بین سرمایه اجتماعی سازمانی و انسجام سازمانی با میانجی‌­گری هم­آفرینی در بین اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه بیرجند انجام گرفته است.
طراحی/ روش‌شناسی/ رویکرد: روش پژوهش توصیفی- همبستگی و نمونه آماری پژوهش شامل 186 نفر از اعضای هیات‌علمی دانشگاه بیرجند در سال تحصیلی 1399- 1400 بودند. برای گردآوری داده‌­ها از پرسشنامه هم‌­آفرینی طاهر پور، پرسشنامه سرمایه اجتماعی سازمانی فاندیو و همکاران و پرسشنامه انسجام سازمانی کاپیتن استفاده گردید. روایی سازه پرسشنامه‌­ها از طریق تحلیل عاملی تأییدی مورد بررسی و تأیید قرار گرفت. ضریب پایایی پرسشنامه­‌ها با استفاده از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ به ترتیب 97/0، 93/0 و 93/0 برآورد گردید. از تحلیل واریانس، تحلیل رگرسیون و مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده­‌ها استفاده شد.
 یافته­‌های پژوهش: یافته­‌ها نشان داد که سرمایه اجتماعی با ضریب استاندارد (74/0) نقش پیش‌بینی کننده‌­ای برای هم‌­آفرینی داشت. از دیگر سو سرمایه اجتماعی (57/0) پیش‌بینی کننده انسجام سازمانی بود. همچنین هم‌­آفرینی پیش‌بینی کننده انسجام سازمانی (74/0) بود. یافته‌­های پژوهش وجود رابطه مثبت و معنادار بین سرمایه اجتماعی سازمانی و انسجام سازمانی را پس از حضور هم‌­آفرینی به عنوان متغیر میانجی تأیید کرد. همچنین نتایج تحلیل معادلات ساختاری نشان داد که الگوی پژوهش از برازش لازم برخوردار است.
محدودیت­‌ها و پیامدها: اثرات نمونه‌گیری و خطای اندازه‌گیری، پرهزینه بودن جمع‌آوری داده‌­ها، عدم همکاری اعضای هیات علمی، متقاعد نمودن افراد درباره محرمانه بودن اطلاعات و ابراز عقایدشان نسبت به سازمان، گستردگی نظام آموزش عالی، کمبود منابع اطلاعاتی مورد نیاز برای انجام پژوهش را می‌­توان از جمله محدودیت­‌های پژوهش حاضر دانست.
پیامدهای عملی: با توسعه سرمایه اجتماعی سازمانی می‌­توان زمینه تحقق انسجام اجتماعی را فراهم ساخت. ضمن اینکه سرمایه اجتماعی با تقویت روابط مبتنی بر اعتماد، تحقق بخش ‌نیز خواهد بود.
ابتکار یا ارزش مقاله: در پژوهش‌های انجام شده در کشور تا کنون به صورت مشخص این چند متغیر به صورت یکجا در میان اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه‌­ها مورد بررسی قرار نگرفته است. ضمن اینکه متغیر سرمایه اجتماعی سازمانی و پرسشنامه مربوط به آن برای اولین بار ترجمه و مورد استفاده قرار گرفته است.
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Role of Organizational Social Capital in Organizational Cohesion with the Mediation of Co-Creation Among Faculty Members of Birjand University

نویسندگان [English]

  • fatem taherpour 1
  • fateme naseri 2

1 Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Birjand, South Khorasan, Birjand, Iran

2 Master of Educational Management. Birjand University, South Khorasan, Birjand, Iran

چکیده [English]

Purpose: This study was undertaken to explore the relationship between organizational social capital and organizational cohesion, with co-creation serving as a mediating variable among the academic faculty members at Birjand University.
Design/ methodology/ approach: A descriptive-correlational research design was employed. The sample comprised 186 faculty members from Birjand University over the academic years 2010-2019. Data collection instruments included Tahirpour's co-creation questionnaire (2021), Fandio et al.'s organizational social capital questionnaire (2015), and Captain's organizational cohesion questionnaire (2005). Confirmatory factor analysis was utilized to ascertain the construct validity of these questionnaires, yielding reliability coefficients (Cronbach's alpha) of 0.97, 0.93, and 0.93, respectively. Data analysis was conducted using variance analysis, regression analysis, and structural equation modeling.
Research Findings: The analysis revealed that social capital significantly predicts co-creation (standard coefficient = 0.74) and organizational cohesion (standard coefficient = 0.57). Furthermore, co-creation was found to be a significant predictor of organizational cohesion (standard coefficient = 0.74). The results affirmed a positive and significant relationship between organizational social capital and cohesion, with co-creation acting as a significant mediator. Additionally, structural equation modeling confirmed the adequacy of the research model's fit.
Limitations & Consequences: The study faced limitations related to sampling and measurement errors, the costly nature of data collection, faculty members' reluctance to participate, concerns over confidentiality, the scope of the higher education system, and a scarcity of necessary research resources.
Practical Consequences: Enhancing organizational social capital could facilitate social cohesion and foster co-creation by strengthening trust-based relationships.
Innovation or value of the Article: This study is distinct within the national context as it specifically investigates these variables among university academic staff, marking the inaugural application and translation of the organizational social capital questionnaire in this domain.
Paper Type: Research Paper

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Co-Creation
  • Social Capital
  • Organizational Cohesion
  • Academic Staff Members of Birjand University
  1. Ahmadi, A. A. & Faizabadi H. (2013). Investigating the promotion of social capital on the improvement of organizational performance (case example: Tehran mayor's staff organizations). Public Administration Quarterly, 3(6): 54-35. ]In Persian [
  2. Akbari, P.; Baharestan, O. (2013). The analysis of the impact of information technology and social capital on entrepreneurial orientation in iran pharmaceutical industry (Case study: Alborz Drug Company). International Journal of Management and Business, 3(3), 215-232.
  3. Banting, K., Richard, J., Will, K., & Stuart, S. (2011). Are diversity and solidarity incompatible?. Inroads journal, (28), 36-48.
  4. Campante, F., Durante, R., & Tesei, A. (2021). Media and social capital. Annual Review of Economics, 14.
  5. Chen, M.; Chang, Y. & Hung, S. (2008). Social capital and creativity in R&D project team, R&D Management, 38(1), 21-34
  6. Coleman, J. (1988). ‘Social capital in the creation of human capital’, American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
  7. Danchev, A. (2006). Social capital and sustainable behavior of the firm, Industrial Management & Data System, 106(7), 953-965
  8. Fandiño, A. M., Valente Antunes Marques, C. M., Rui Manuel Pereira de Menezes & Sónia Margarida Ricardo Bentes (2015). Organizational Social Capital Scale Based On 7. Nahapiet and Ghosal Model: Development and Validation. Review of Contemporary Business Research. Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 25-38.
  9. Forsström, B. (2005). Value co-creation in industrial buyer-seller partnerships-creating and exploiting interdependencies: an empirical case study. http://www.impgroup.org/uploads/dissertations/dissertion_19.
  10. Fussel, H.; Harrison, J. & Kennan, W. (2006). The relationship between social capital, transaction costs, and organizational outcomes: a case study, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(2), 148-161
  11. Ghanimi, M. Z. & Bahmani, A. (2020). The fourth national research conference in accounting and management. Proceedings of the Fourth National Research Conference on Accounting and Management. Tehran, Iran. ] In Persian [
  12. Grootaert, C. (2003). Measuring social capital: an integrated questionnaire, World Bank Working Paper, 18, 1-53.
  13. Harun, M. Z. M. B., & Mahmood, R. B. (2012). The Relationship between Group Cohesiveness and Performance: An Empirical Study of Cooperatives Movement in Malaysia. International Journal of Cooperative Studies, 1(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.11634/216826311706110
  14. Heidemann, K.A. (2010). Giving Voice to Language: Basque Language Activism and The Politics of Education Reform in France, 1969-1994, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
  15. Hill, linda A. (2014). Collective Geniues. in Harvard Business Review.
  16. Ievdokymov, V., Lehenchuk, S., Zakharov, D., Andrusiv, U., Usatenko, O., & Kovalenko, L. (2020). Social capital measurement based on “The value explorer” method. Management Science Letters, 10(6), 1161-1168.
  17. Kaiser, A. A. (2010). Bridging social capital formation in a faith-based organization. Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University.
  18. Kaptein, M. (2005), Scott Avelino, “Measuring corporate integrity: a survey- based approach”, Corporeate Governance, 5(1), pp. 45-54.
  19. Keshavarz, M. (2013). Predicting employees' job motivational potential through organizational cohesion: a study of Shiraz Municipal Civil Engineering Organization. Master's thesis in educational management. Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. ] In Persian [
  20. Kettunen, P. (2009). Adopting Key Lessons from Agile Manufacturing to Agile software Product Development – A Comparative Study. Technovation, 29(6), 408-422.
  21. Khairandish, M. & Jamshidi, H. (2016). The effect of social capital on organizational entrepreneurship through the mediation of career motivation. Social capital management. 3(1), 68-43. ] In Persian [
  22. Kristensson, P., Matthing, J., & Johansson, N. (2008). Key strategies for the successful involvement of customers in the co-creation of new technology-based services. International journal of service industry management, 19(4), 474-491.
  23. Lenard, P.T. Straehleb, C. & Ypi, l. (2011) Global Solidarity: Contemporary Relation Theory, Human Relations Management Theory, 9:99-130.
  24. Lesser, E. L. (2000). Knowledge and social capital: Foundations and applications”, butterworth-heinemann, Boston.
  25. Liu, Y. & Meyer, K.E. (2020). Boundary spanners, HRM practices, and reverse knowledge transfer: the case of Chinese cross-border acquisitions. J. World Bus. 55 (2).
  26. McCann, C., Prest Talbot, A. L., & Westaway, A. (2021). Social Capital for Social Change: Nine Tenths Mentoring Programme, a Solution for Education (In) Justice in South Africa?. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 16(1), 45-59.
  27. Mohammadi Hezaveh, N. (2018). The mediating role of organizational cohesion in the relationship between meritocracy and environmental accountability. Master's Thesis in Educational Management, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran. ] In Persian [
  28. Mohammadi, A., Mohammadi, F., & Soghada, E. (2020). Studying the effect of website quality and social capital on co-creation and innovation: regarding the role of knowledge sharing. World Journal of Media, 15(1): 155-177. ] In Persian [
  29. Moharrer, L. (2013). Investigating the relationship between managers' power sources, organizational climate and organizational cohesion in South Zagros Oil and Gas Exploitation Company. Master's thesis in educational management, Shiraz University, Iran. ] In Persian [
  30. Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage, Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266
  31. Nekui Moghaddam, M., Behzadi Gudry F. & Keshavarz, H. (2012). Investigating the relationship between types of organizational cultures with the components of organizational success including flexibility, coherence, speed and innovation in selected government hospitals of Kerman province, 2010. Publication: Hospital. 11(1), 82-73. ] In Persian [
  32. Rezvani, M. & Taghrai, M. T. (2012). The role of organizational social capital in the trend towards organizational innovation in knowledge-based companies (case study: companies located in Science and Technology Park of Tehran University). Change management research paper, 3(6), 53-28. ] In Persian [
  33. Sapran, A.S. (2010). Exploiting cooperative movement strengths. Pelancar, 37, 10- 11.
  34. Seyedjavadin,reza (2010). Management of organizational behavior, Tehran, publisher: negah danesh. . ]In Persian[.
  35. Spence, L. J.; Schmidpeter, P. & Habisch, A. (2003). Assessing social capital: small and medium sized enterprises in Germany and the U.K., Journal of Business Ethics, 47(6), 17-29
  36. Spence, L. J.; Schmidpeter, P. & Habisch, A. (2003). Assessing social capital: small and medium sized enterprises in Germany and the U.K., Journal of Business Ethics, 47(6), 17-29
  37. Stubberup, P. (2010). Co-Creation in Danish Retail Banking. Master’s Thesis Copenhagen Business School, Department of Marketing Cand. Merc. Strategic Market Creation.
  38. Syaharuddin, S., Mutiani, M., Handy, M. R. N., Abbas, E. W., & Jumriani, J. (2022). Putting Transformative Learning in Higher Education Based on Linking Capital. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 16(1), 58-64.
  39. Taherpour, F. & Asgari, A. (2018). Co-creation at the university. Third International Conference on Dynamic Management, Accounting and AuditingTehran Iran: 1-11. ] In Persian [
  40. Taherpour, F. (2018). The relationship between social wear and co-creation with the mediating role of organizational self-esteem among faculty members of Iran's top universities. Public Management Perspectives, 9 (1): 109-128. ] In Persian [
  41. Taherpour, F. (2021). Design and validation of measurement of co-creation measurement in university. Public Management Perspectives, 12 (1). ] In Persian [
  42. Tanev, S., Bailetti, T., Allen, S., Milyakov, H., Durchev, P., & Ruskov, P. (2011). How do value co-creation activities relate to the perception of firms' innovativeness?. Journal of Innovation Economics Management, (1), 131-159.
  43. Vilanova, E. P. & Josa, R. T. (2003). Social capital as managerial phenomenon, tampere, university of Technology.
  44. Yi, Y., & Gong , T. (2013). Customer value co-creation behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Business research, 66(9), 1279-1284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.026
  45. Zhang, X. & Ye, C. & Chen, R. Wang, Z. (2011). Multi-focused strategy in value co-creation with customers: Examining cumulative development pattern with new capabilities. Production Economics, 132, 122-130.
  46. Zhang, W. (2022). Social capital, income and subjective well-being: evidence in rural China. Heliyon, e08705.

 

چشم انداز مدیریت دولتی
دوره 14، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 56
دی 1402
صفحه 103-123